Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Ted Ward on September 16, 2025 at 11:47

i meant mineral rights. sorry

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 16, 2025 at 13:50

Ted, that is an interesting offer considering how far Section 32 is from the defined Haynesville Shale fairway.  Approximately 8 to 9 miles as the crow flies.  I am not familiar with Areana Minerals and there is no website or other internet presence under that name.  There is an Arena Minerals that has a Facebook page which I will link below.  Here is what that companies Facebook page states.  Arena, if that is the same company that offered the lease, is in the Lithium business.  If you could share the terms of the lease offer, that might help to know whether Arena or Areana is interested in Oil & Gas or in Lithium.

About us

Arena Minerals is led by a team with undeniable expertise in lithium processing which has successfully advanced and brought several lithium projects to production. Chile, the world’s leading brine-based lithium producer, uses a Brine-Mixing Process focused on the use of reagents purely derived from lithium rich brines, which Arena Minerals has adapted to the salars of Argentina. This process results in products much better suited for Battery Grade Lithium Carbonate production while carrying substantially lower production costs. The process was originally developed and implemented in Chile with members of Arena’s team. Arena is uniquely positioned to transition Argentina from the past decade of resource growth through to world class supplier of low cost lithium products, by implementing its proprietary processing and providing a source of the required lithium rich reagent sourced from its unique Antofalla salar and a world class team.

https://ca.linkedin.com/company/arena-minerals-inc.

Permalink Reply by Ted Ward on September 17, 2025 at 6:38

LITHIUM! Wow that's way out of left field. The parcel is 120 acres in sec. 31 and 40 acres in section 32. the offer was for 1,200 per acre, which is funny because 2 weeks ago some scammers wanted  to buy it all for $801.875 per acre. Went straight to round file. I think the best way forward is to roll the dice and hope for a drill bit one day.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 17, 2025 at 6:42

The location doesn't make sense for lithium or Haynesville Shale - without some science that is determinative for one or the other.  I would decline until there is more information.

Permalink Reply by Rock Man on September 17, 2025 at 6:44

Have to wonder if there is a shallow formation (than the Smackover) out in this area with big water source potential (and perhaps lithium content).

Rodessa??? 

Permalink Reply by Ted Ward on September 17, 2025 at 9:07

have no idea if this means anything but there have been 1 well drilled in section 31 and 1 well drilled in section 32. In section 31 a 6800 foot vertical well (serial #222790) was completed in 02-1999. It lasted until 11-2013. Its best month it produced 61,873 MCF. In 2001 a well was drilled in section 32 (serial #225685) that was 9800 feet vertical.On Good Friday 2001 i talked to the engineer and was told that was gas was present but the investors were meeting monday to discuss the situation. It was P&A in April 2001. O well. so that is all i know about those 2 sections. maybe you guys can make some sense out of this

Permalink Reply by Rock Man on September 17, 2025 at 17:21

Those two wells you mention may be the reason that this group is trying to lease this area - essentially trying to exploit "known" gas potential in one or two different intervals.

6800' zone may have some offset potential (thinking that this may be Rodessa section) while the 9800' well with the possible bypassed gas zones (Hosston SS?) may be a target.

More modern frac technology may be a key issue in trying to access for recoverable gas for either or both of these intervals.

Permalink Reply by Ted Ward on September 18, 2025 at 4:50

Thanks Rock Man for the reply.  As absolute novice at this could it be assumed  that we could possible be looking at gas bearing shale at between 6000 to 10000 feet?

Permalink Reply by Rock Man on September 18, 2025 at 5:00

Not gas bearing shale play here based on these two wells.

Conventional reservoirs - not horizontally drilled / but may be frac'd in vertical wells

Permalink Reply by Ted Ward on September 18, 2025 at 5:30

thanks again Rock Man! I did not even know that they fracked horizontal wells. oh well we will see what happens. 

Permalink Reply by Ted Ward yesterday

I have been informed  that site work  has been started for a well in S32 T14N R06W. All i have gotten is a pre application on intent to drill a while back. Is there any way to confirm this and find out the operater,depth, ect?

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant yesterday

Ted, there will be answers to those questions once a permit to drill is issued.  32-14N-6W is the Harper Field.  I'll remember that and send you a link to the permit once it is entered in the state O&G database.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page