Eric Camp's Discussions (56)

Discussions Replied To (44) Replies Latest Activity

"Yes they can. See the recent Finley Resources Case decided by the Railroad Commissio…"

Eric Camp replied Feb 4, 2009 to Update on please help discussion. Another Shelby county post

56 Feb 9, 2009
Reply by kane

"I agree with Two Dogs and Jim. The surest way to make sure you are ok is to get a re…"

Eric Camp replied Feb 1, 2009 to Wondering if my lease is good

19 Feb 4, 2009
Reply by Jack Blake

"Just FYI... Chesapeake's affiliated pipeline company in Louisiana is Louisiana Midst…"

Eric Camp replied Feb 1, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases

45 Feb 5, 2009
Reply by Robert G. Oliver

"While I agree with KB that the lease may bind the subsidiaries actions, perhaps a be…"

Eric Camp replied Feb 1, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases

45 Feb 5, 2009
Reply by Robert G. Oliver

"Parker, Any type of gas pipeline - gathering, transmission or otherwise - is going…"

Eric Camp replied Jan 30, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases

45 Feb 5, 2009
Reply by Robert G. Oliver

"Gathering Line from Lessee's well. Lessee is getting around non-surface use lease by…"

Eric Camp replied Jan 30, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases

45 Feb 5, 2009
Reply by Robert G. Oliver

"And damages for breach of contract (the lease) and damages caused by the right-of-wa…"

Eric Camp replied Jan 30, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases

45 Feb 5, 2009
Reply by Robert G. Oliver

"Not a NIMBY case at all... Joe the Landowner wants their minerals developed but not…"

Eric Camp replied Jan 30, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases

45 Feb 5, 2009
Reply by Robert G. Oliver

"True. But that landowner is the exception, not the rule. And that landowner is in a…"

Eric Camp replied Jan 30, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases

45 Feb 5, 2009
Reply by Robert G. Oliver

"It is a unit well and the land is in the unit... But the landowner negotiated a non-…"

Eric Camp replied Jan 29, 2009 to Laying Pipelines Over Lands Covered By Non-Surface Use Leases

45 Feb 5, 2009
Reply by Robert G. Oliver

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service