d laurenson's Discussions (42)

Discussions Replied To (29) Replies Latest Activity

"Thanks.....that would be nice. "

d laurenson replied Jun 3, 2013 to Trying to make sense of this

19 Jun 16, 2013
Reply by P.G.

"We have a large landowner that was working on a lease with Chesapeake, actuallly the…"

d laurenson replied Jun 3, 2013 to Trying to make sense of this

19 Jun 16, 2013
Reply by P.G.

"429' FSL & 1872' FEL OF SEC 25. PBHL: 250' FNL & 380' FEL OF SEC 25 This is…"

d laurenson replied Jun 3, 2013 to Trying to make sense of this

19 Jun 16, 2013
Reply by P.G.

"thanks so much....I'll have to check on that for my section"

d laurenson replied Jun 3, 2013 to Trying to make sense of this

19 Jun 16, 2013
Reply by P.G.

"How do you tell that the bottom of the well goes into your section?"

d laurenson replied Jun 3, 2013 to Trying to make sense of this

19 Jun 16, 2013
Reply by P.G.

"40% is leased to CHK with several expiring in the next several months. Petro was off…"

d laurenson replied Feb 25, 2010 to Landowner operator vs Chesapeake operator

11 Feb 26, 2010
Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner

"He hasn't leased to Chesapeake according to what has been filed. He dealt with Chesa…"

d laurenson replied Feb 25, 2010 to Landowner operator vs Chesapeake operator

11 Feb 26, 2010
Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner

"Chesapeake is unitizing but have been told that they may be withdrawing. Have been t…"

d laurenson replied Feb 25, 2010 to Landowner operator vs Chesapeake operator

11 Feb 26, 2010
Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner

"I guess he has the $$ to fund the well and eventually wants more of the revenue. He…"

d laurenson replied Feb 25, 2010 to Landowner operator vs Chesapeake operator

11 Feb 26, 2010
Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service