A Question for Chesapeake Royalty Recipients - GoHaynesvilleShale.com2024-03-28T12:43:15Zhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/forum/topics/a-question-for-chesapeake-royalty-recipients?commentId=2117179%3AComment%3A3997707&x=1&feed=yes&xn_auth=noThanks, Steve. I look forwar…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2021-09-29:2117179:Comment:39977072021-09-29T20:13:05.682ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p>Thanks, Steve. I look forward to hearing what you find. I'm curious if the Marketing fee is a "value" that ever turns into a deduction across a number of consecutive monthly statements. I'm trying to figure out if CHK still sells your gas to CEMI and deducts a marketing charge on your older HBP lease.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thanks, Steve. I look forward to hearing what you find. I'm curious if the Marketing fee is a "value" that ever turns into a deduction across a number of consecutive monthly statements. I'm trying to figure out if CHK still sells your gas to CEMI and deducts a marketing charge on your older HBP lease.</p>
<p></p> I have two leases - one is 50…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2021-09-29:2117179:Comment:39977822021-09-29T20:03:38.645ZSteve Phttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/StevePorter
<p>I have two leases - one is 50 years old that was HBP; the second, a 2009 lease with a "no fees" addendum to my lease.</p>
<p>My most recent check stub has deductions for the following. I have production from 2 wells, covered by the same lease.</p>
<p>well #1</p>
<p>fuel gathering(compression) there is a small amount listed (less than a $, but my total royalty for this property was less than $150</p>
<p>fuel mainline same as…</p>
<p>I have two leases - one is 50 years old that was HBP; the second, a 2009 lease with a "no fees" addendum to my lease.</p>
<p>My most recent check stub has deductions for the following. I have production from 2 wells, covered by the same lease.</p>
<p>well #1</p>
<p>fuel gathering(compression) there is a small amount listed (less than a $, but my total royalty for this property was less than $150</p>
<p>fuel mainline same as above</p>
<p>Gathering a larger deduction, still less than $10</p>
<p>Marketing there is a listing of several hundreds of $ under the "value" column, but not deduction for me</p>
<p>Transportation about the same as the first two above</p>
<p></p>
<p>well # 2 - a 2009 lease that has a "no fees" addendum</p>
<p>only deduction is for severance tax</p>
<p></p>
<p>For well #1, my royalties are clearly separated into two different royalty amounts - reflected the 1/8th lease from the 1/4th lease, but there are deductions from both. I think this must be incorrect. I will have to go into my files and pull out some older royalty checks from CHK to see if I've been missing this. </p>
<p></p>