Division Orders for Allocation Wells - GoHaynesvilleShale.com2024-03-28T12:14:23Zhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/forum/topics/allocation-wells?groupUrl=sanaugustine&feed=yes&xn_auth=noDivision Orders 40530553 RE…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-19:2117179:Comment:35151532015-07-19T16:02:44.985Zetx44https://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/etx44
<p></p>
<p>Division Orders 40530553 RED RIVER 164-PHILLIPS ALLOC<br/><br/>DOs came in mail Saturday 07-18-2015.<br/><br/>As drilled 7055' total - Red River 164 5320' 75.408%, Phillips 1735' 24.592%.<br/><br/>Proposed lateral was 8565'</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Division Orders 40530553 RED RIVER 164-PHILLIPS ALLOC<br/><br/>DOs came in mail Saturday 07-18-2015.<br/><br/>As drilled 7055' total - Red River 164 5320' 75.408%, Phillips 1735' 24.592%.<br/><br/>Proposed lateral was 8565'</p>
<p></p> XTO and Exco are the only ope…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-10:2117179:Comment:35111312015-07-10T13:29:40.475Zjffree1https://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/jffree1
<p>XTO and Exco are the only operators I expect to see drilling Shelby for Haynesville and neither are in a great hurry. BP could show up but I don't expect them to anytime soon. The nearer you are to the county line... the better your odds but I don't expect to see a lot of drilling in the next couple of years.</p>
<p>XTO and Exco are the only operators I expect to see drilling Shelby for Haynesville and neither are in a great hurry. BP could show up but I don't expect them to anytime soon. The nearer you are to the county line... the better your odds but I don't expect to see a lot of drilling in the next couple of years.</p> southerntag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-10:2117179:Comment:35108912015-07-10T01:45:14.601ZCarlton Byron Matlockhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/CarltonByronMatlock803
<p>southern</p>
<p>southern</p> Which part of the county? XTO…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-09:2117179:Comment:35106732015-07-09T13:53:30.610Zjffree1https://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/jffree1
<p>Which part of the county? XTO still has open permits and Exco also has a couple there now.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Which part of the county? XTO still has open permits and Exco also has a couple there now.</p>
<p></p> We have some acreage and mine…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-09:2117179:Comment:35101662015-07-09T00:53:05.078ZCarlton Byron Matlockhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/CarltonByronMatlock803
<p>We have some acreage and mineral rights in southern Shelby county and have heard of no drilling interest anywhere around. Any information on when the gas companies will be interested again?</p>
<p></p>
<p>We have some acreage and mineral rights in southern Shelby county and have heard of no drilling interest anywhere around. Any information on when the gas companies will be interested again?</p>
<p></p> Julie,Thanks for the help, yo…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-08:2117179:Comment:35100612015-07-08T22:44:36.810Zetx44https://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/etx44
<p>Julie,<br/><br/>Thanks for the help, you are right that Exco is a good company to deal with.<br/>I have found them even easy to deal with, So they will likely be fair with Allocation.<br/><br/>Kelly</p>
<p>Julie,<br/><br/>Thanks for the help, you are right that Exco is a good company to deal with.<br/>I have found them even easy to deal with, So they will likely be fair with Allocation.<br/><br/>Kelly</p> More platstag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-08:2117179:Comment:35096372015-07-08T15:25:27.922Zjffree1https://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/jffree1
<p>More plats</p>
<p>More plats</p> Kelly,
What I think Exco migh…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-08:2117179:Comment:35097902015-07-08T15:19:24.636Zjffree1https://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/jffree1
<p>Kelly,</p>
<p>What I think Exco might do and what they actually do may be two different things. That being said... I have never heard anyone say anything disparaging about Exco and I think they will do what the state considers 'fair' for the mineral owners and the operators. Exco is taking pains to show, on their plats, how much of a lateral in included in each unit. Hypothetically, a % of production will be assigned to each unit according to the footage found in that unit. Surveying bore…</p>
<p>Kelly,</p>
<p>What I think Exco might do and what they actually do may be two different things. That being said... I have never heard anyone say anything disparaging about Exco and I think they will do what the state considers 'fair' for the mineral owners and the operators. Exco is taking pains to show, on their plats, how much of a lateral in included in each unit. Hypothetically, a % of production will be assigned to each unit according to the footage found in that unit. Surveying bore paths is a pretty exact science these days so once that footage is determined I wouldn't expect it to change. Once they figure out what % to assign to a particular unit... then everyone in that unit will receive their proportionate share of that production. So, I see it as just adding another factor in the equation. Once you get a DO you should contact owner relations to find out if that is correct so you can check your figures. I'm thinking it won't change your decimal interest because only the part of production attributed to your original unit will be shown on your pay statements. I could be wrong about that, however, because bean counters have a special knack for making things <em>complicated.</em></p>
<p>I am attaching plats for all the units included in the allocation units you listed. I am adding the plat for Red River 164-Dillard Alloc #1H to make an important point. I misspoke yesterday when I said not all of a unit may be assigned to an allocation unit. I have seen other operators (Anadarko comes to mind) split up existing units and assign a part to different allocation units. That does not appear to be what Exco is doing.</p>
<p>If you look at the plat for the original Red River 164 unit... it is small, weirdly shaped and badly positioned for long bore paths. The only economic way to drill some of the rock contained within that unit is to make up allocation units and extend the lateral into another unit. Using what is now considered extremely short laterals just to drill within the confines of RR 164 would not be feasible because the well would never pay out.</p>
<p>Exco has permits for the RR 164-Phillips Alloc well and for a RR 164-Dillard Alloc well. Everyone in RR 164 will get royalties for a portion of each well. The people in the Phillips Unit will benefit only from their assigned production from the part of the lateral found in the Phillips Unit. Same for the people in the original Dillard Unit. That doesn't seem very fair until you turn it around and consider that they could (I expect they will) drill from the south end of either Phillips or Dillard, including only a short portion of the lateral in the RR 164 Unit, and then those people in Phillips or Dillard would get the lions share while RR 164 people might get a lot less. The whole point of allocation units, though, is to drill rock <em>economically</em> which might otherwise go undeveloped. It is a win for everyone, IMO.</p> Kelly,
I will retrieve the pl…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-07:2117179:Comment:35092282015-07-07T23:05:57.925Zjffree1https://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/jffree1
<p>Kelly,</p>
<p>I will retrieve the plats in the morning and we can take a look. I had my eyes dilated today and everything's still blurry right now.</p>
<p>JF</p>
<p></p>
<p>Kelly,</p>
<p>I will retrieve the plats in the morning and we can take a look. I had my eyes dilated today and everything's still blurry right now.</p>
<p>JF</p>
<p></p> % of lateral is a good way t…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-07:2117179:Comment:35092952015-07-07T21:23:20.199Zetx44https://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/etx44
<p></p>
<p>% of lateral is a good way to do it and may used but it is not the law, because there is no law yet.</p>
<p>A court case in Eagle Ford that could have helped was settled out of court.</p>
<p>IT Is not a RRC thing, but a court thing.</p>
<p>Kelly</p>
<p></p>
<dl class="discussion clear i1 xg_lightborder">
</dl>
<p></p>
<p>% of lateral is a good way to do it and may used but it is not the law, because there is no law yet.</p>
<p>A court case in Eagle Ford that could have helped was settled out of court.</p>
<p>IT Is not a RRC thing, but a court thing.</p>
<p>Kelly</p>
<p></p>
<dl class="discussion clear i1 xg_lightborder">
</dl>