As the Smackover (SMK) Lithium (Li) play picks up steam we need to acknowledge that from regulatory and legal standpoints, there will be significant differences between the play in South Arkansas and in East Texas. Very soon we expect to know more about royalty provisions and regulatory guidelines. From past experience with dissimilarities between Texas and Louisiana mineral laws and regulatory statutes governing the Haynesville Shale, we hope to limit confusion and make it easier to access the information that will be pertinent to land and mineral owners.
In order to help members and quests to the website and to avoid confusion, we will start two new discussions, one for Texas and one for Arkansas. There is an abundance of information in the original SMK Lithium discussion threads and members may want to click on them and then save them to their computer bookmarks/favorites to be able to access them in the future as they will eventually rotate off the main page. After 24 hours, comments in those discussions will be closed but the replies will remain available in the website archive. Archived discussions are available by using the search box in the upper right corner of all website pages.
GoHaynesvilleShale.com was one of the first resources for mineral owners to learn basics, share information and generally provide a place where mineral owners could become more informed managers of their mineral assets in the age of the Internet. The website is pleased to continue to provide those services to those who will benefit from the SMK Lithium Play. Please keep in mind two things. You are a key part of the on the ground intelligence network by letting your friends and neighbors know about GoHaynesvilleShale.com and encouraging them to participate in site discussions. And since GoHaynesvilleShale.com is free for all to use, please consider a donation to help keep the website online.
Tags:
The fight over lithium royalties continues in SW Arkansas, 1.82% now off the table
After nearly a day and a half of hearings, it took less than five minutes for members of the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission to unanimously deny a royalty request made by a group of companies that have become known as the "Big 5."
Standard Lithium, Lanxess, ExxonMobil/Saltwerx LLC, Albemarle Corp. and Tetra Technologies Inc. had filed jointly to set the royalties on lithium-containing brine in the state at 1.82%. Landowners countered with 12.5%.
A royalty decision is needed before the companies can begin extracting brine in southwest Arkansas that contains economically feasible amounts of lithium. Lithium is used in a variety of commercial purposes but is currently needed in large supply for EV batteries.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, an arm of the U.S. Department of the Interior, the lithium in southern Arkansas could meet nine times the expected global demand for the element in car batteries in 2030.
While not back at square one, there is a deep chasm between what landowners believe the brine is worth and what the companies are willing to pay, says Shreveport-based mineral consultant Skip Peel.
In the Arkansas landowners' favor, Peel says, is their knowledge of what some of the companies are paying East Texas landowners for brine royalty and leases — a significantly higher amount than the 1.82% rate offered to Arkansas landowners.
The East Texas leases need context, the companies said, as many of them come with deductions that the companies said would ultimately net the owners the same 1.82%.
Peel says southwestern Arkansas landowners are also familiar with the Haynesville Shale gas play in Louisiana and Texas in which leases of $5,000 to $10,000 an acre and 25% royalties were not uncommon.
There is a significant difference in the East Texas and Arkansas brine, Peel says.
"Most of what we've got in southwest Arkansas is basically 250 to 300 (milligrams per liter)." In East Texas, "There's a range, basically 600 to 800, it's twice or better than the concentration per liter than southwest Arkansas has."
He says the Big 5 used that in what he heard as an implied threat to build their facilities in Texas.
"It's hard to really understand, or for me to understand, just how the veiled threat of 'We'll just take our ball and leave Arkansas and go to East Texas' landed with those commissioners," he said.
Attorney G. Alan Perkins in Little Rock has been representing the South Arkansas Mineral Association. He says the group is pleased that the AOGC rejected the proposed 1.82%, because it was not "fair and equitable."
"The Commissioners sent a firm message to the industry applicants that they need to disclose more economic information about their projects to support a future royalty application," he said. "Our clients are supportive of extracting lithium from the rich brine resources of the Smackover formation in south Arkansas, so long as it is fair to the mineral owners as well as the industry."
So what happens next?
Perkins thinks the companies are anxious to move forward, but the process is ultimately a slow one because of notice and regulatory requirements, and even a quick response might not come before the AOGC until early next year.
Peel agrees, and said he believes the Big 5 are "huddled up" for a quick response.
"They're going to pay the $65 an acre they have to, because that's part of the existing regulations," he said. "The question is, what will they pay over and above that as a royalty on the lithium?"
Email Liz Swaine at Liz.Swaine@theadvocate.com.
Good summary article of this situation. It will be interesting to see how this whole issue evolves over time not only in Arkansas but in NE Texas (Cass County et al).
As I reviewed comments about these hearings, I was surprised to hear nothing (or next to nothing) about H2S issues associated with any Smackover related lithium extraction operations.
I am not very familiar with H2S concentrations in Smackover waters in Arkansas, but I know that this inert and noxious compound is present in variable and oftentimes high concentrations in NE Texas.
Anyone researching H2S will find out that it doesn't take very high concentrations (in ppm) to be dangerous or even fatal.
But even in VERY small concentrations (technically not dangerous), the rotten eggs odor associated with this compound is extreme and pervasive. Just ask the residents of Luling (Tx) as well as various Permian Basin areas about this omnipresent smell (which over time tends to numb one's olfactory nerves).
Any lithium extraction method will involve moving a LOT of Smackover formation water from source wells through extraction processing equipment and then back to injection wells. Lots of fluid being moved - and is there such a thing as a totally "closed" system that contains 100% of all H2S related compounds (and odors)?
Anyone leasing their minerals for brine extraction in this area needs to be aware of this issue.
Are you trading your clean air / non stinky air for a royalty check? And negatively impacting one's property values due to "gee, it stinks in this area" reaction of potential buyers?
Thanks for the reminder, Rock Man. H2S is an extreme danger to those in close proximity to the source. Usually that means employees of the operator or someone trespassing on a production location. Also in this specific case, pipelines and re-injection locations As Rock Man states, it can be fatal. The much greater concern for anyone living in the vicinity is the noxious odor and the impact on someones ability to smell not to mention the impact on their property values. Landowners need to know the risks and the consequences.
110 members
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com