Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on April 30, 2009 at 8:14

I had heard rumors that this well had the best production of any Petrohawk well. I had my fingers crossed that the rumor was correct, but that doesn't appear to be the case.

It's a great well nonetheless.

(Thanks Skip)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on April 30, 2009 at 8:58

Earlene,

I'm not the least bit disappointed. It's a wonderful well.

I had heard it was the top producer and just wanted to correct that.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by w.r. frank on April 30, 2009 at 10:36

Parker,

Congrats. I know you have been waiting on this. I would round that to 18 mmcfd in my mind. Good pressure too.

Well #?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on April 30, 2009 at 12:04

w.r. frank,

Thanks. The well number is #238527.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kenya Simonton on April 30, 2009 at 12:16

what area is this have property down there

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by sesport on April 30, 2009 at 14:14

Keya - Sect. 37, T17N, R13W

On a street/geographical map of the area, it's just due south of the Jimmy Davis Bridge on 70th Street along the river.

Best - sesport :0)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The_Baron on May 1, 2009 at 3:14

Its the old Landfill.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on April 30, 2009 at 16:16

Parker, congratulations on a fantastic well!!!! May your decline be shallow and your natural gas prices be good. So sayeth the Shale!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on April 30, 2009 at 16:22

Thanks Les,

It's not my well, just in my area, but I'm excited for friends that are in the Section west of it, where the Hamel well is at.

Heck, to be honest, I'm just excited for all of this for our whole area. I can't even conceive what our town will be transformed into over the next couple of years.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by w.r. frank on April 30, 2009 at 16:21

Not on SONRIS yet. How did you get info?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on April 30, 2009 at 16:34

w.r. frank,

This is just the well test data. I've been told that sometimes the actual IP may be higher. Give or take a couple of MMCF, I'd call it a barn burner, one way or the other.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on April 30, 2009 at 16:35

I hope that some of the experts might comment on how or why test data would differ from the actual IP.

Also the lateral is a bit shorter than some of HK's other wells.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page