For Louisiana Transfer of mineral rigths when there is a signed lease in place for a producing well

The following situations actually happened here in Louisiana to a young couple who just moved next door to me.  So, I am asking this on their behalf and hoping for information to pass on to them. Therefore, I am thanking you in advance for your sage advice.

Here are the facts:

1.  They bought a house on 2 acres, and the seller signed over the minerals rights to the home buyer in the closing for the property on March 14, 2022.

(SIDE NOTE:  They had no idea they were even getting the mineral rights, until it was stated in the closing.  In fact, they had not even asked for the mineral rights.  So, go figure.  Lucky couple!)

2.  The seller had signed a lease about 4 years ago and has been receiving monthly royalty checks for the last year and half.

3.  The seller received the last royalty check on March 14,  2022 for sales of January produced natural gas.

THE COMMON SENSE ASSUMPTION

Since the Mineral Rights were included in the sale of the house on March 14, 2022, and the royalty check of May 2022 should be for gas produced in March 2022 .... technically speaking should the May check be split 50/50 between the seller and owner?  But, it may not be worth the hassle for that month.

However, starting in June 2022 (April Gas Sales) and all royalty checks going forward should they now be directed to the new owner of the mineral rights?  And, if so I assume the couple should contact the Oil & Gas Company to forward what documents are need to activate the transfer to them.

Is the above assumption correct or not?  Or in this case, does the signed lease in place affect the new owners of the mineral rights in some other way?

I have no experience with the transfer of Mineral Rights.  Plus, we all know COMMON SENSE and the law does not mix.

Just trying to help them out. Any advice to pass on the young couple will be appreciated.  Thank you!

 

Views: 343

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

When ownership of mineral rights burdened by an existing lease are transferred in a sale, it is the responsibility of the new owner to contact the lessee, provide proof of the sale and initiate the change of owner in the oil company's pay deck.  This doesn't happen overnight and I've never seen an instance of splitting a month's worth of royalty revenue between two parties.  Depending on when the new owner starts the process, the oil company will determine an "effective date" if the parties to the sale did not agree to one.  The lessee or the operator may require the new owner to "ratify" the existing lease that burdens the mineral right.  The seller, who has been in pay, should contact the operator or lessee if different from the operator and ask for the most efficient manner in which to do this.  They are the owner of record and have an owner number.  I suspect that there may be a form that both parties may execute and notarize but I would also suggest supplying a copy of the deed of sale.

I don't need to vouch for Skip Peel's answer, I am wondering though if perhaps the former owner's lease allowed surface rights which might encumber the new owner of property?  Might also be that lease about to expire and not worth the prior owner's hassle?

Skip, thank you for the info I have passed it on to the couple, and they will start the wheels turning.  Again THANK YOU!

Boomer:

Based upon the above facts, this is what usually happens:

1)  As Skip states, the new Purchaser is required to contact the present Lessee to notify them of the change of ownership.  Per the terms of most form leases, Lessee is not obligated to recognize the transfer of Lessor's rights under the lease until it is notified in writing and/or a copy of a recordable act evidencing such transfer or sale is provided to them.

-- Commentary - this should be done prior to May sales going out if at all possible (explanation below)

2)  Owner Relations for the current Lessee should be contacted ASAP - each company requires different documentation, but nearly all will require a copy of the Cash Sale evidencing the transfer of the property, which will show that there was not a mineral or royalty reservation and thus prove up the transfer for the Division Order Analyst.  At that time, the DO will usually also require a W-9 form for the new owner(s) and will likely send a package with same to be completed as well as a new Division of Interest letter to be executed by the Buyer, thereby owner information and SSN(s) / TIN(s) is (are) confirmed.

3) Settlement with the old and new owner is usually made based upon the nearest date of sale as opposed to the date of settlement for sales. Given your example, if the transfer was effected by the Lessee TODAY, the old owner would at least receive this month's gas production (typically companies are paying on January production starting around the 20th of March, whether actually sooner or later) as well as a payment in April (for February production).  The new owner in this scenario would definitely receive all royalty payments after June (pay on April production.  Payments on gas are usually 45-60 days after the date of physical sale - hence as the new owner is it better to act quickly and not wait.

4)  It gets a bit interesting on the March payment.  Some companies will book back to the date of the sale, and then pay the new owner on the first day of the forward month (being April production, paid in June).  Others will attempt to track production based upon daily production data and then split the March settlements (paid in May) based upon that.  I have not heard of a company splitting production on a pro-rata basis mid-month; wells do not produce at a constant rate and therefore the Transfer Order effective date is what is used.

5) If the new owner is errant in timely notifying the Lessee, the company can choose to rely on the language in the lease regarding notice of transfer, or sometimes will attempt to make best efforts to remedy the situation close to the date of transfer if (a) it can, and (2) the new owner is not so late in the notification that it cannot recover the royalties paid to the old owner.  In general if one can notify the Lessee within the month or so, you have a good shot of receiving all royalties due; if one is a year out from the sale, you'll start getting the paid on the next possible date of transfer.

6) In uncommon circumstances the company may adjust out of the old owner's royalty if either that owner is receiving other royalties elsewhere from the same Lessee or if the payment is large enough to merit recovery of royalties paid in error.  If it's small and the old owner was receiving comparatively little in royalty payments, they will likely make the adjustments the best they can out of existing revenues and go forward.

With regard to Iris' question - the new owner buys the property subject to prior agreements in force at the time of the sale. By the same logic that the new owner can collect on the benefits and proceeds of the lease (royalties), it also must live with the other terms and obligations under the same lease (ie, potential surface encumbrances).  It is possible for a new owner to challenge the lease only under certain circumstances, the primary one being effective notice.  In this case, the likelihood of the new owner not having sufficient notice is small (if the lease was prior recorded, basically nonexistent).  Consider - if one knows enough to know about and ask for the royalties, you acknowledge that the lease by which the royalty is created also exists.

Dion, thanks for the info!  It has been passed on to start the wheels turning.  Thanks a lot!

RSS

© 2022   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service