GDP - B-NEZ 43 H -1; Sec.43- Twn1S- Range 8E - GoHaynesvilleShale.com2024-03-19T01:38:28Zhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/forum/topics/gdp-b-nez-43-h-1-sec-43-twn1s-range-8e?groupUrl=tangipahoa-parish&commentId=2117179%3AComment%3A3485854&groupId=2117179%3AGroup%3A3282302&feed=yes&xn_auth=noZero production reported for…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2016-07-16:2117179:Comment:36167652016-07-16T13:47:55.342ZJohn Doehttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/JohnDoe89
<p>Zero production reported for April as well. #2 is still reporting production. Has anyone heard if there is a problem with the well? Seems like production abruptly stopped.</p>
<p>Zero production reported for April as well. #2 is still reporting production. Has anyone heard if there is a problem with the well? Seems like production abruptly stopped.</p> The production reporting has…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2016-06-26:2117179:Comment:36130212016-06-26T13:22:55.990ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p>The production reporting has some problems. Makes it hard to make an educated guess. There is nothing in the well files that addresses the lack of recent reporting for #1.</p>
<p>The production reporting has some problems. Makes it hard to make an educated guess. There is nothing in the well files that addresses the lack of recent reporting for #1.</p> I saw that B-Nez 1 reported z…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2016-06-26:2117179:Comment:36132592016-06-26T11:55:57.568ZJohn Doehttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/JohnDoe89
<p>I saw that B-Nez 1 reported zero output for the month of March. B-Nez 2 reported expected output. Is that a mistake or is something wrong with the well?</p>
<p>I saw that B-Nez 1 reported zero output for the month of March. B-Nez 2 reported expected output. Is that a mistake or is something wrong with the well?</p> Thanks for the update, Franki…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-10-15:2117179:Comment:35481692015-10-15T21:26:07.846ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p>Thanks for the update, Frankie. A lot of that going around unfortunately.</p>
<p>Thanks for the update, Frankie. A lot of that going around unfortunately.</p> Also that they posted results…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-10-15:2117179:Comment:35479432015-10-15T19:35:53.604ZFrankie D Elderhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/FrankieDElder
<p>Also that they posted results on Sonrise for Kinchen 58H-1 came in at 663 BOPD and 201 MCFD. I was told that they scrubbed and put a lift on well. In July they were having problems. Not what they wanted but what is is what is....</p>
<p>Also that they posted results on Sonrise for Kinchen 58H-1 came in at 663 BOPD and 201 MCFD. I was told that they scrubbed and put a lift on well. In July they were having problems. Not what they wanted but what is is what is....</p> When the well was tested in J…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-10-12:2117179:Comment:35470332015-10-12T18:45:58.711ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p>When the well was tested in June it was on a 13/64" choke setting. Pretty tight. There is no way to know when and how much the operator adjusts the choke except for the twice a year DT-1 tests. There should be a well test posted to the SONRIS Well File in November sometime. You can compare that orifice size to the original setting. As bad as GDP needs the cash flow I can't imagine them restricting the flow on this or any other of their TMS wells unless there is a mechanical problem with…</p>
<p>When the well was tested in June it was on a 13/64" choke setting. Pretty tight. There is no way to know when and how much the operator adjusts the choke except for the twice a year DT-1 tests. There should be a well test posted to the SONRIS Well File in November sometime. You can compare that orifice size to the original setting. As bad as GDP needs the cash flow I can't imagine them restricting the flow on this or any other of their TMS wells unless there is a mechanical problem with the well.</p> Looks like some production nu…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-10-12:2117179:Comment:35470312015-10-12T18:31:38.128ZJohn Doehttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/JohnDoe89
<p>Looks like some production numbers for this well were finally posted on the state site. They look low compared to what's been reported in the past for similar wells in that area. Is that because it is a mediocre well or are they intentionally keeping the production less than full potential?</p>
<p>Looks like some production numbers for this well were finally posted on the state site. They look low compared to what's been reported in the past for similar wells in that area. Is that because it is a mediocre well or are they intentionally keeping the production less than full potential?</p> If the wells are any good the…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-21:2117179:Comment:35165992015-07-21T01:12:56.144ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p>If the wells are any good they could be reported in GDP's 2nd. Quarter corporate presentation on August 5. Even if the wells are very good that news may take a back seat to the question of whether GDP can maintain its New York Stock Exchange listing. Their stock is now below a dollar. Lessors under those wells, and indeed under any GDP wells, should be reading the Main Page discussions about what to do to protect themself when their operator takes bankruptcy.</p>
<p>If the wells are any good they could be reported in GDP's 2nd. Quarter corporate presentation on August 5. Even if the wells are very good that news may take a back seat to the question of whether GDP can maintain its New York Stock Exchange listing. Their stock is now below a dollar. Lessors under those wells, and indeed under any GDP wells, should be reading the Main Page discussions about what to do to protect themself when their operator takes bankruptcy.</p> Any updates on these wells? …tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-07-21:2117179:Comment:35165182015-07-21T01:02:55.825ZJohn Doehttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/JohnDoe89
<p>Any updates on these wells? One of them has had a flare for a while. I believe that is #2. I heard that #1 may have some problems and they were hauling some pipe from it. Does anyone know anything about production or when something might be reported?</p>
<p></p>
<p>Any updates on these wells? One of them has had a flare for a while. I believe that is #2. I heard that #1 may have some problems and they were hauling some pipe from it. Does anyone know anything about production or when something might be reported?</p>
<p></p> Goodrich Petroleum Corporatio…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2015-06-22:2117179:Comment:35045342015-06-22T12:10:11.028ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p><b>Goodrich Petroleum Corporation Announces Operational And Planning Update</b></p>
<p>HOUSTON, June 22, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Goodrich Petroleum Corporation (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=gdp">GDP</a>) today <b>announced that it has commenced completion operations on two of its six drilled but uncompleted wells in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale ("TMS"). The B-Nez 43H-1 (70%WI) and B-Nez 43H-2 (74% WI) wells in Tangipahoa Parish are near completion of fracture stimulation, with flow…</b></p>
<p><b>Goodrich Petroleum Corporation Announces Operational And Planning Update</b></p>
<p>HOUSTON, June 22, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Goodrich Petroleum Corporation (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=gdp">GDP</a>) today <b>announced that it has commenced completion operations on two of its six drilled but uncompleted wells in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale ("TMS"). The B-Nez 43H-1 (70%WI) and B-Nez 43H-2 (74% WI) wells in Tangipahoa Parish are near completion of fracture stimulation, with flow back and initial production expected within 1 - 2 weeks. </b>The Company currently anticipates completing the remaining four drilled but uncompleted TMS wells from mid-July through early September. All six wells, which are located within the Company's core acreage position of 150,000 net acres, will be completed prior to the fall borrowing base redetermination scheduled for October 2015.</p>
<p>The Company's full year capital expenditure budget of $90 - 110 million was front-end loaded, with approximately 46% of the budget at the mid-point of guidance spent in the first quarter, as the Company entered the year with three rigs under contract. The Company currently has zero rigs running with plans to bring a rig back to the TMS in October, with no change to previously issued guidance. The Company re-affirms second quarter capital expenditure guidance of $10 – 15 million and exited the first quarter with in excess of $100 million of liquidity. The Company maintains the ability to enhance liquidity by pursuing a potential joint venture or sale of its Eagle Ford Shale asset.</p>