My NARO Presentation: Refracs, Mid-Bossier, Drilling Faults & One Operator Per Unit Rule - GoHaynesvilleShale.com2024-03-28T18:20:26Zhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/forum/topics/my-naro-presentation-refracs?commentId=2117179%3AComment%3A4025379&xg_source=activity&feed=yes&xn_auth=noI think the application is se…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2022-06-06:2117179:Comment:40254912022-06-06T17:07:19.170ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p>I think the application is self explanatory. Two unit operators are allowed under approval of this applicaton. The operator of the unit well and any other H wells continues to operate and report production to the state, the operator seeking to drill the long lateral HC wells will operate and report those wells. Since all HA operators prefer to drill long laterals, this would appear to be the most simple and straight forward means of doing so.</p>
<p></p>
<p>I think the application is self explanatory. Two unit operators are allowed under approval of this applicaton. The operator of the unit well and any other H wells continues to operate and report production to the state, the operator seeking to drill the long lateral HC wells will operate and report those wells. Since all HA operators prefer to drill long laterals, this would appear to be the most simple and straight forward means of doing so.</p>
<p></p> Skip:
I would find "OOC Resci…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2022-06-06:2117179:Comment:40254882022-06-06T17:02:19.774ZDion Warr, CPLhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/DionWarr
<p>Skip:</p>
<p>I would find "OOC Rescinds 'One Operator per Unit Rule" a bit of a misnomer. (I even have a problem with their declaration of it).</p>
<p>To allow for CULs with dissimilar operators in adjacent units, OOC has to provide for a mechanism which fits the statute to allow for such situations to occur while addressing current unit rules, orders and regulations. The operation which you show here is merely a convention allowing for special purpose in this situation. Goodrich is not…</p>
<p>Skip:</p>
<p>I would find "OOC Rescinds 'One Operator per Unit Rule" a bit of a misnomer. (I even have a problem with their declaration of it).</p>
<p>To allow for CULs with dissimilar operators in adjacent units, OOC has to provide for a mechanism which fits the statute to allow for such situations to occur while addressing current unit rules, orders and regulations. The operation which you show here is merely a convention allowing for special purpose in this situation. Goodrich is not "taking over a well", "taking over another operator's operations" or "taking over a unit"; each continues to operate its respective single unit and any current or future single unit lateral development. This happens in other states with no issue; LA OOC is following a similar track as other states in addressing the "long lateral" issue.</p>
<p>The recognition of this scheme is consistent with and along the lines of "prevention of the drilling of unnecessary wells, prevention of waste, promote orderly development" principles of Regulatory. The non-operator of the CUL / operator of the component unit CHK has the right to object or oppose Goodrich and its proposed well, offer testimony, provide its own development plan, etc. It can enter a deal with Goodrich to the mutual benefit of both parties with or without the permission of OOC. What is immutable is that there must be one operator / responsible party per well.</p> Thanks, Dion. You join jay i…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2022-06-06:2117179:Comment:40255612022-06-06T16:32:00.381ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p>Thanks, Dion. You join jay in presuming a case other than what I state. The facts are in the Aethon AFE. The question is in my comparison of original well designs with varying proppant loads. My presentation did not seek to make a case of refracs over new drills. It posed the question, which early wells may be candidates for refracs.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thanks, Dion. You join jay in presuming a case other than what I state. The facts are in the Aethon AFE. The question is in my comparison of original well designs with varying proppant loads. My presentation did not seek to make a case of refracs over new drills. It posed the question, which early wells may be candidates for refracs.</p>
<p></p> Skip:
Would agree with Jay o…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2022-06-06:2117179:Comment:40252562022-06-06T16:21:15.554ZDion Warr, CPLhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/DionWarr
<p>Skip:</p>
<p></p>
<p>Would agree with Jay on this one. "Show" as to showing what may be left in bypassed reserves-in-place from earlier drilling and development with older completion techniques is not compelling if you have remaining fairway and infill PUDs. Unlimited capital, worried about "milking" down areas with wells not cost-effective at $4 but cost-effective at $8+ could make sense, but it is not a good enough reason to develop in this price environment with limited capital budget…</p>
<p>Skip:</p>
<p></p>
<p>Would agree with Jay on this one. "Show" as to showing what may be left in bypassed reserves-in-place from earlier drilling and development with older completion techniques is not compelling if you have remaining fairway and infill PUDs. Unlimited capital, worried about "milking" down areas with wells not cost-effective at $4 but cost-effective at $8+ could make sense, but it is not a good enough reason to develop in this price environment with limited capital budget if you have virgin territory and/or remaining alternate locations. If the ROI delta was closer you might be able to make a case for what you suggest, aka "while we're here..." Otherwise, drill the better well with more favorable economics.</p> I see it quite a bit. The fi…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2022-06-06:2117179:Comment:40252442022-06-06T13:26:02.127ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p>I see it quite a bit. The first half dozen or so times I checked each application against my play maps. The correlation was 100% for sections with faults.</p>
<p>I see it quite a bit. The first half dozen or so times I checked each application against my play maps. The correlation was 100% for sections with faults.</p> Slide 14 - I take it S24 has…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2022-06-06:2117179:Comment:40252412022-06-06T13:15:44.795ZOLDDOG2020https://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/WadeBritt
<p>Slide 14 - I take it S24 has a fault which is why they are drilling different length laterals from section 13. I thought that was odd when I saw the application but wasn't sure why they were doing it like that. Now that you've pointed it out it makes sense.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Slide 14 - I take it S24 has a fault which is why they are drilling different length laterals from section 13. I thought that was odd when I saw the application but wasn't sure why they were doing it like that. Now that you've pointed it out it makes sense.</p>
<p></p> I think that is possible howe…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2022-06-06:2117179:Comment:40252342022-06-06T02:04:12.020ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p>I think that is possible however I don't know if it is practical in all cases. The storage capacity per well would be the missing element in the equation. Storage in salt domes might be a better option. There are a good many gas storage wells in the Lake Bistineau Field. These appear to be depleted Pettet wells. I'll post a link to a SONRIS page below for anyone that would care to check them out. Denbury is the only O&G company that I'm aware of that stores a lot of CO2. The…</p>
<p>I think that is possible however I don't know if it is practical in all cases. The storage capacity per well would be the missing element in the equation. Storage in salt domes might be a better option. There are a good many gas storage wells in the Lake Bistineau Field. These appear to be depleted Pettet wells. I'll post a link to a SONRIS page below for anyone that would care to check them out. Denbury is the only O&G company that I'm aware of that stores a lot of CO2. The company uses it for recovering oil from older fields by way of a CO2 "flood".</p>
<p>Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.</p>
<p><a href="https://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_sectwnrng2">https://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_sectwnrng2</a></p>
<p><span>Denbury Inc.</span></p>
<p><a href="https://www.denbury.com/Home/default.aspx" target="_blank">https://www.denbury.com/Home/default.aspx</a></p>
<p></p> Dang, thanks Bill.
tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2022-06-06:2117179:Comment:40252882022-06-06T01:50:39.624ZSkip Peel - Mineral Consultanthttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/ilandman
<p>Dang, thanks Bill.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Dang, thanks Bill.</p>
<p></p> I actually found the details…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2022-06-05:2117179:Comment:40253792022-06-05T23:59:08.250ZBill Rhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/BillR
<p>I actually found the details in your Presentation to be far easier to understand and comprehend than most other things I follow in the O&G Industry. Really appreciate your posting it on here! </p>
<p>I actually found the details in your Presentation to be far easier to understand and comprehend than most other things I follow in the O&G Industry. Really appreciate your posting it on here! </p> Do you know from an engineeri…tag:gohaynesvilleshale.com,2022-06-05:2117179:Comment:40252312022-06-05T23:53:10.467ZW. Carter Richardsonhttps://gohaynesvilleshale.com/profile/WCarterRichardson131
<p>Do you know from an engineering stand point could carbon be re-injected into the depleted wells and "stored"</p>
<p>forl some other use in the future?</p>
<p>Do you know from an engineering stand point could carbon be re-injected into the depleted wells and "stored"</p>
<p>forl some other use in the future?</p>