If a well produced 3,361,321 for the first 24 months production, what would be a reasonable guess as to what the EUR for the well would be?
Thanks,
Bobi
Tags:
I know HK stated that 80% of the EUR of their wells are produced within 10 years. Just wondering if anyone has heard a "rule of thumb" for the first 2 years?
Would it be estimated to be in the range of an 8 BCF well?
Or more?
Or less?
Bobi, I would estimate a well should produce ~ 36% of its EUR in the first 24 months based on a restricted rate (choke) program. So the well would have a projected EUR of 9.3 Bcf.
Also, you can put the monthly production into an Excel file generate a decline curve specific to that well.
Thanks Les. That is very helpful information.
This particular well did begin production on a 14/64 choke and is a HK well.
Do you think the first 24 months is a better determination of the best wells than the IP?
Also what % of Haynesville wells do you estimate to be in the 9.3 or higher range?
I recently read that the average EUR of a Haynesville well is 3.0, do you think this figure is correct?
Bobi,
Do you think the first 24 months is a better determination of the best wells than the IP? Yes
Also what % of Haynesville wells do you estimate to be in the 9.3 or higher range? I do not have an estimate but it would likely be less than 20%.
I recently read that the average EUR of a Haynesville well is 3.0, do you think this figure is correct? No
Les,
What do you think the average EUR of a Haynesville well is?
Bobi,
Most operators are still in the 6.5 Bcf neighborhood for the average.
Bobi:
Per your request:
I hadn't visited these models in a while (to give you an idea, I've still got Arp-based hyperbolic plots in my spreadsheets tailored to more wide-open flow). Based on "the old days" of 24 - 28/64 (or adjustable) chokes, those numbers would rate around 6.4 - 7.5 BCF, depending upon constants that worked ca. 2008-09. That would model based upon IP around 15 - 17 MMcfd.
Pure hyperbolic doesn't fit anymore, especially with HK (or should I say BHP), whose more recent restricted-choke wells are starting to look like the proverbial "rising fastballs" of the HS; some of their recent well completions are actually increasing their reported production in successive months (undoubtedly from better fracs and cleanup from flowback). Based upon their recent track record, 8+ BCF EUR doesn't look out of the realm.
So, I guess, IMHO, I fit somewhere between Les B and Arthur Berman (who, I am sure if he were to weigh in here, would tell you that your numbers are obviously wrong, your well is about to spontaneously collapse into a black hole and will take about approximately 1/2 BCF of gas back into itself before the pipeliners block off the valves. Because shale wells just don't produce more than 2.5 BCF.
Bobi:
Post-script: One of my more "tweaked" (modified) plots crosses 24 mo. @ 3.3 BCF and EURed at 9.9 BCF. But it started at IP = 18 MMcfd. It might help to know what well we're following here... -- DLW
This particular will is 239822.
I was surprised when I compared this to 239471. 239741 is in South Caddo at the DeSoto line. Initially, I assumed that the South Caddo well would be significantly higher, but actually the S. Caddo well was 2,460,168 for it's first 24 months of production.
I see in the latest bhpbilliton presentation that they have a new map that I haven't seen before differentiating the 8 BCF areas. Since they weren't kind enough to provide Section, Township and Range information, I've been trying to get a better handle on the local production potential.
Thanks for your help.
Here is the presentation:
http://www.bhpbilliton.com/home/investors/reports/Documents/2011/11...
Slide 42
307 members
409 members
286 members
6 members
49 members
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by