One of the shale gas pioneer companies in the United States said earlier this month that depressed oil and natural gas prices may force it to breach loan covenants over the next year and that a massive debt pile threatens its ability to “continue as a going concern.”
Chesapeake Energy—which helped propel the shale gas revolution in the late 2000s with leading positions in the Marcellus, Barnett, and Haynesville shale basins—is now facing tough times trying to heal its balance sheet, on which US$9.7 billion in total debt weighs.
The company is looking to improve its balance sheet and is evaluating multiple options to reduce debt and to become, finally, free cash flow positive next year.
Chesapeake Energy’s troubles are indicative of the current woes of the whole U.S. shale patch—firms now have to focus on generating free cash flow and successfully manage the debt they had taken on to boost production instead of profits. Squeezed between the scarce availability of capital from debt and equity markets and investors demanding more profits, many U.S. oil and gas firms are reducing capital expenditure plans for 2020.
Producers are also cutting production targets and now admit that the fast-paced growth of the past two years will slow down to moderate growth over the next few years.
In this challenging environment, aggravated by low commodity prices, Chesapeake Energy warned in early November that “If continued depressed prices persist, combined with the scheduled reductions in the leverage ratio covenant, our ability to comply with the leverage ratio covenant during the next 12 months will be adversely affected which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.”
The stock took a dive and has now lost nearly 60 percent in less than a month, and during this time it also touched a 25-year-low. Year to date, Chesapeake Energy’s shares have lost 72 percent.
Yet, the company and some analysts believe that Chesapeake Energy is not dead yet and will not die.
According to Matthew DiLallo, senior energy and materials specialist with The Motley Fool, Chesapeake’s reduced spending next year, reduced natural gas production, and the strive for free cash flow could help it to avoid default.
Due to lower oil and gas prices, Chesapeake is slashing its 2020 capital expenditure forecast by around 30 percent, and expects to reduce 2020 production by some 10 percent.
“We will continue directing the majority of our -- capital to our highest margin oil assets and our capital spend will be ultimately be determined by commodity prices in 2020,” Chesapeake’s President and CEO Doug Lawler said on the Q3 earnings call.
The reduction in cash costs will allow the company to target free cash flow in 2020, he said, adding that Chesapeake is assessing multiple ways to bolster its balance sheet.
“We continue to evaluate multiple opportunities that can further improve our balance sheet, including divestitures, deleveraging acquisitions and capital funding options,” Lawler said.
Chesapeake Energy is reportedly in talks with leading Haynesville basin producer Comstock Resources to sell its Haynesville assets in Louisiana, in a deal that could be valued at more than US$1 billion. If the deal goes through, this could be one strategic divestiture to raise some cash and reduce the debt pile.
The legacy of Aubrey lives on. IMO, the only way Chesapeake survives is as a much smaller company after selling off the assets required to pay down debt to a manageable level. Aubrey dug Chesapeake a very deep hole to try and climb out of.
It sounds like you put that last line in your post to toss red meat at me... "Aubrey dug Chesapeake a very deep hole to try and climb out of." Well, I'm not going to bite. After all these years, Aubrey just isn't worth my time or interest anymore.
Nope. No meat tossing. This is Keith discussion. Not sure how you thought it was personally directed at you. Aubrey ham strung the company in a number of ways that crippled the successor management in their efforts to right the ship.