Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,279)

Discussions Replied To (57) Replies Latest Activity

"KB, I am not familiar with the specific permitting process for production and non-FE…"

Les Bamburg replied Jun 14, 2009 to Alabama Bend

58 Oct 4, 2009
Reply by Jere

"KB, that is my thought as this site could be production facility or pipeline facilit…"

Les Bamburg replied Jun 14, 2009 to Alabama Bend

58 Oct 4, 2009
Reply by Jere

"Jere, the well would be perforated in only the section where the lateral is located…"

Les Bamburg replied Jun 12, 2009 to Alabama Bend

58 Oct 4, 2009
Reply by Jere

"Ralph, a sand play would be a conventional sandstone rock formation. Until recently,…"

Les Bamburg replied Jun 3, 2009 to seismic survey

19 Feb 13, 2011
Reply by Phillip Pruitt II

"Landowner, force pooling can accomplish several things. It unitizes (pools) all the…"

Les Bamburg replied Jun 3, 2009 to Chesapeake has applied for 5 additional drilling and production units designated as ....

14 Jun 29, 2009
Reply by Kat Bloomfield

"Landowner, the applicant would need to force pool even if 100% of the acreage is lea…"

Les Bamburg replied May 30, 2009 to Chesapeake has applied for 5 additional drilling and production units designated as ....

14 Jun 29, 2009
Reply by Kat Bloomfield

"Landowner, not all Petrohawk's rigs have the top-drive or horsepower required to dri…"

Les Bamburg replied Apr 27, 2009 to Nabors Rig #507 moving onto LOE H15 16N 9W Section10 North of Ringgold off Hwy 371

80 Jul 18, 2010
Reply by Harold Boze

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service