Red River Parish

All things, people, companies, places & geology related to the Haynesville Shale play in Red River Parish.

Location: Red RIver Parish
Members: 305
Latest Activity: Oct 22, 2020

Discussion Forum

Request For Assistance

In order to help a NW LA mineral owner who has been denied the opportunity to fully benefit from their Haynesville Shale acreage, I am asking the members for their assistance.  I need to document…Continue

Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Oct 22, 2020.

Lease Group Letter Agreement Assistance Request

I would like to connect with the leaders and/or members of Haynesville lease groups who successfully negotiated the Letter Agreement process and leased in the early days of the Haynesville land…Continue

Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Oct 13, 2020.

Unleased Mineral Owners in Haynesville Shale Units

If you are a UMI under a well or wells operated by the following companies, I would like to speak with you.  Click on my name in blue to go to my private page.  If you are not already a "friend",…Continue

Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Feb 18, 2020.

Goodrich in Red River

Goodrich is also drilling its Cason-Dickson 14 and 23 No. 1 and 2 wells in the Red River Parish. The Cason-Dickson wells are planned as 10,000 foot laterals and expected to be fracked in February. …Continue

Started by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) Jan 3, 2018.

Shut In Wells 3 Replies

Wondering about two wells in Red River Parish listed as shut in. #250240 and #250241? Novice here so any information much appreciated.Continue

Started by R B. Last reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Dec 12, 2017.

Long Petroleum 8 Replies

What are all these Long Petroleum leases in the Red River Parish Legal news?

Started by cocodrie man. Last reply by jkw3 Sep 16, 2014.

Drilling in DeSoto Parish and Red River Parish 10 Replies

Broadly speaking, the drilling activity in DeSoto and Red River Parishes into the Haynesville has historically been similar.  Surely, DeSoto Parish has more often than not had more rigs working than…Continue

Started by cocodrie man. Last reply by Charles Edward Luke Jun 30, 2014.

Section 20 or 17 14N 9W royalties

Wondering if anyone in section 20 14n 9w or 17 14n 9w getting paid royalties yet for the well that has been producing since June?Continue

Started by coral Dec 3, 2012.

Thorn Lake Field 7 Replies

New permits continue to be taken in Red River Parish.  Petrohawk has recently permitted two wells in the Thorn Lake Field (09-14-11).  What is the economic impetus for this?  Why do some companies…Continue

Started by cocodrie man. Last reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner May 11, 2012.

Shell Permits New Shale Gas Well in Carroll Creek Field 6 Replies

Shell has permitted a new well in Section 21 of T12N-R2W in the Carroll Creek Field.  From the permitted vertical depth it appears this will be another Bossier Shale test rather than the Haynesville…Continue

Started by Les B. Last reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner May 11, 2012.

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Red River Parish to add comments!

Comment by Duster on June 17, 2008 at 20:37
Hi, My name is John and I live about 3 mi north of Coushatta on 71. I have been wanting to post some comments and information to this forum but have been to busy with company. I will have more time after this weekend. Just a couple of notes though. The DNR web site shows a drilling application hearing BRACKY BRANCH FIELD on June 17 (today).

I have a few photos of the sections and aerial map. Overlay in the photo gallery of my website. I am new at this so I hope I got this right. This area will also be forced pooled.

Hope this Helps
Comment by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on June 16, 2008 at 13:42
Take a look at this and get the word out.

Permalink Reply by DeSotoDude 37 minutes ago
Send Message
Delete ECA announced Adcock 3H in Section 15, 13N, 9W, Red River at 8 mmcfd. See map in presentation on ECA website. ECA going to drill nine more HA. wells in 2008 and will have eight rigs running by YE08.

► Reply to This

Upload Files

Attach File(s):

Permalink Reply by Haynesville 30 minutes ago
Delete It looked like from the map that the other well was in Sabine and was producing greater than 5 this what you saw?

► Reply to This

Upload Files

Attach File(s):

Permalink Reply by DeSotoDude 15 minutes ago
Send Message
Delete Yes. It is close to RR/Sabine line. Go on sonris and look under "wells by organization". Encana has no wells in Sabine, but its partner, SWEPI, does.

If you take Encana in RR, HK in Bossier, Goodrich in DeSoto, CHK in Caddo, Camterra in Caddo/DeSoto and PVA in East Tx (North Carthage field), you can draw a big area. All we need is for SWEPI to announce some results in 9N, 10N and 11N to get Sabine covered.

In all, there have been 50 wells penetrate the HA. Shale so the oil companies have a lot of data. Not all wells were completed, but they know the Shale is there and they have logs and cores. If CHK, HK and Shell release production results from wells completed (8 horizontals by CHK alone), the lid will really blow off(see CEO Floyd Wilson in his speech last Wednesday in Houston on 50 bcfe/section and "no dry holes'). These guys are NOT idiots and they run public companies so you know they are being conservative.

► Reply to This

Upload Files

Attach File(s):

Members (304)


© 2021   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service