In regards to the Austin Chalk, there is no fracking involved. These wells are produced through the natural fractures contained in the formation. No additional stimulation is needed for production purposes so the water issue would be a moot point for the Austin Chalk.
I didn't know that. Thanks for educating me. This is why I like this forum. It gives everyone a chance to learn, even if it also gives some of us an opportunity to display our ignorance:)
I read the following statement in a recent article about the AC and it leads me to believe what you say was true but may be changing - Quote: "The Austin Chalk was initially drilled vertically, but new techniques used in horizontal drilling have opened up new venues to profit from. By using multiple fracture stages, oil volumes have increased substantially. The Austin Chalk lies directly above the Eagle Ford. "
I noticed that the La. Anadarko wells are horizontal wells with laterals over 1 mile. Would they be fracking these long laterals? I would like to know more. I just assumed they would be fracked.
Wilmer and Steve,
You both maybe right. An old friend that mentored and coached me through the Tuscaloosa some 40 years ago had very definite opinions about producing from AC. He had been Field Superintendent for the Hunt Brothers up in the Yazoo MS area before he went out on his own. He told me it was a good idea to sand/gravel pack the fractures in the AC. While its not facing the formation as such it is a method to hold the formation open. One of the problems was that you could have good pressure one day and nothing the next because the formation collapsed after production began. His theory was that if you keep the formation open with a sand matrix then you will have much better production and a longer life to the well. No one seems to be doing this at the present time. It seems to be a lost procedure. Maybe Anadarko is looking at this and planning to use a version in the future.
Sounds to me like they are going to try something new. I saw the post that you did about the disposal well. That says to me that they are very serious about drilling the AC. They will need a salt water disposal well under their control in the area. That's why its very important to put in your lease that only SW from your site or lease can be injected into a well on your property without them paying you for the use of it.
A fair question ShaleGeo : Thanks for the opportunity to set the record straight : My posts regarding Wright Water Resources are not a solicitation they are merely a recommendation. I understand your concern, but, I have no personal interest in Wright Water Resources. But, as a pond owner in the TMS, I realize that without someone like Benjamin of Wright doing something to help pond owners get noticed by the O&G scouts , small landowners like me with water to sell will be left out of the loop if Heckmann, etal show up. No one at Wright has ever asked me to promote them anywhere at any time. If you know someone else that is trying to help landowners sell their water, please let us know about them. Wright is the only one I have to found to recommend to this date.
P.S. Benjamin Hall (who founded and runs Wright Water Resources) is also Keith Mauck's (who owns this website) brother-in-law, which puts him on my(the landowners) side of the fence.
I became interested in what arguably appeared to be hype or promotion of Benjamin. I decided it best to go head on,, and to talk with Benjamin. In doing so my concerns and apprehension were alleviated. I own a bit less than 200 acres in the TMS. I have a pond and a spring fed stream along one of my boundaries. If our communities are fortunate enough to have the TMS play work out, I don't need Benjamin or anyone else to tell me that water availability may become an issue. Moreover, if demand increases dramatically (and many of us in the TMS are cautiously optimistic that it will), and a drought persists, the need for matching of resources may become pronounced. Also, it would be nice to see local folks who may not directly benefit from oil or gas exploration on their property get some benefit. In addition, there is already a good bit of regulatory overlay on what one can do with certain water resources, and surely there will be more. The idea of becoming educated on what is out there, and what may be in the chute is attractive to me. And the idea of having a group of similarly minded and situated landowners banded together makes sense to me.
I spent about an hour on the phone with Benjamin last week. I'm not very easily impressed, but I found Benjamin impressive. The idea of some resource that can match landowners with water resources and proximate to sites where water is needed to industry requiring a water source may become important, and Benjamin seems straightforward and candid.
Again, I have zero interest in promoting anyone re water resources, and even so, I respectfully offer my thoughts for whatever (if anything) they may be worth.