full name
  • full
Share on Facebook MySpace

full name's Groups

full name's Discussions

Chesapeake - Old Vine well revenue statements
5 Replies

Has anyone that has Vine wells received their first Chesapeake Statement?I got my first one yesterday and volume on all wells was zero as was the amount received.  This a 50/50 Chesapeake/SWN section…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Steve P Apr 28.

SWN Oil Restoration Fee and joint owership calculations
1 Reply

SWN apparently just changed GEP over to their revenue statements.The new statement included a Production Tax labeled RESFEE which I assume is the Oilfield site restoration fee, established with RS…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Mar 28.

Question about a new pipeline.
5 Replies

We are under discussions for a pipeline in Red River parish.  The prints are titled "VIne North Project Expansion, Desoto Parish". It is being done by Enable Midstream and is a 20" pipe.  I think it…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Feb 28.

SWN sold some Indigo wells
3 Replies

SWN sold some of the Indigo wells to Diversified Gas & Oil.  It appears that they are the older vertical wells.If you get an ACH enrollment form, give them a call and verify your information…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Sep 20, 2021.

 

full name's Page

Latest Activity

full name replied to Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant's discussion SONRIS: How to search for individual cross unit lateral well production
"Thanks for the suggestion Skip.  I have done that in the past as the need arises.  My issue now is with joint ownership wells.  Since Vine and GEP were sold I am being shorted on some (not all) wells in some sections.  It is easy…"
Aug 5
full name replied to Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant's discussion SONRIS: How to search for individual cross unit lateral well production
"This is great. Thanks for the information.  Is there a similar way to get the same thing for non cross unit well production?"
Aug 4
full name replied to Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant's discussion Louisiana probes source of methane cloud spotted near pipelines
"1 ton of oil equivalent (59°F) to cubic feet of natural gas = 39,656.67 cu ft N.G. 2 tons of oil equivalent to cubic feet of natural gas = 79,313.34 cu ft N.G. 3 tons of oil equivalent to cubic feet of natural gas = 118,970.00 cu ft N.G. 44 tons…"
Jun 7
full name replied to Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant's discussion U.S. NATURAL GAS MONTHLY SETTLEMENT PRICE TRACKER
"A therm is 100,000btu's.  Assuming I have all the decimals in the correct place,   1 MCF is approximately 1,000,000 BTU's (MM BTU) so it should be 10 therms per MM BTU. BTW my gas bill and all associated charges (i.e…"
May 31
Steve P replied to full name's discussion Chesapeake - Old Vine well revenue statements
"my combined CHK and Vine statements showed up on EnergyLink yesterday afternoon.  And, yes, the day before, I have the same statement with zeros for everything."
Apr 28
M B Gilster replied to full name's discussion Chesapeake - Old Vine well revenue statements
"Sim. experiences as Shorty but as he stated the Tues. nite CHK zero's were replaced last night w/ legit production #'s but I shouldn't have been surprised as they just moved to EnergyLink on 18 April."
Apr 28
full name replied to full name's discussion Chesapeake - Old Vine well revenue statements
"it did come back but now there are other issues."
Apr 28
SL replied to full name's discussion Chesapeake - Old Vine well revenue statements
"My EnergyLink statement usually shows up on the 25th.  I have not seen anything this month.  "
Apr 28
shorty Townsend replied to full name's discussion Chesapeake - Old Vine well revenue statements
"I had interest with Brix and Vine.  Two days ago my Chesapeake statement through EnergyLink showed zero's on everything.  Not long after the April statement was viewable they took it down, yesterday evening an April statement from…"
Apr 28
full name posted a discussion

Chesapeake - Old Vine well revenue statements

Has anyone that has Vine wells received their first Chesapeake Statement?I got my first one yesterday and volume on all wells was zero as was the amount received.  This a 50/50 Chesapeake/SWN section with Chesapeake as the operator.  SWN paid correctly.Called Chesapeake -as usual they new nothing and had me send a email to them.See More
Apr 27
5 Comments
full name replied to Greg Whitson's discussion Sonris Abbreviation PWH
"Try this one. Try this one. SERIAL      WELL NAME WELL NUM ORG ID FIELD PARISH PROD TYPE SEC TWN RGE EFFECTIVE DATE API NUM253146      MCDONLD 10&22-9-14 HC 002 S9226 2872 43 00 010 09N 14W 02/25/2022…"
Apr 17
full name posted a discussion

SWN Oil Restoration Fee and joint owership calculations

SWN apparently just changed GEP over to their revenue statements.The new statement included a Production Tax labeled RESFEE which I assume is the Oilfield site restoration fee, established with RS 30:87.   Section E states that these fees shall be borne by the responsible parties and not by the royalty and overriding royalty owner.Also if you have any wells that are jointly owned SWN changed the way they calculate owner volume - apparently they halved the volume and doubled the distribution…See More
Mar 28
1 Comment
Birdsview replied to full name's discussion Question about a new pipeline.
"Hello Skip Hope all is well with you and your family . Skip how does section 19. 14 n. 14 w. de soto parish look in that area for the bossier shale? What percentage of the bossier shale look and other shales in those areas. would you mind taking a…"
Feb 28
full name replied to Mister Sunday's discussion Could a War in Ukraine Disrupt NG Transportation?
"The EIA gives a good overview of prices, demand and shipments.  In the Overview section there is an International section. Provides prices for both Europe and Asia.  Prices are in MMbtu making it easy to compare.  This comes out…"
Feb 23
full name replied to full name's discussion Question about a new pipeline.
"Makes sense.  The two feeder lines look like 12" lines.  One goes due north the other north west into 12N 11W.  Both have a MLV at this location. If they reverse the flows, that would fill a 20" line if you account for…"
Feb 16
full name posted a discussion

Question about a new pipeline.

We are under discussions for a pipeline in Red River parish.  The prints are titled "VIne North Project Expansion, Desoto Parish". It is being done by Enable Midstream and is a 20" pipe.  I think it may be connecting to the new North-South pipeline they are constructing. My question is the pipeline ends in S 19, T 12N, R 10W in the middle of a field.  There are two small feeder lines nearby but nothing else.  Anyone have any idea what they are going to do with this?See More
Feb 15
5 Comments

Profile Information

How would you describe yourself?
Landowner
First Name
full
Zip Code
38139
Plays that you follow
Lower Smackover Brown Dense, Haynesville

Comment Wall

You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!

Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com

  • No comments yet!

PollDaddy

 
 
 

© 2022   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service