Saw this tonight

The Haynesville Shale is back.

Natural gas production in the dry gas shale play jumped in both 2017 and 2018.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration is projecting Haynesville gas production in May 2018 to reach 8.54 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d), up from April’s 8.33 Bcf/d. Production was roughly 6.00 Bcf/d in January 2017.

Quiet achievement

If the May projection is reached, that would be a 42.3% increase in Haynesville dry gas production in just the last 17 months, a feat that has been quietly achieved, Kallanish Energy reports.

The Haynesville is again one of the top shale gas plays in the U.S., behind only the Appalachian and Permian basins. The Haynesville Shale is producing roughly 13% of U.S. shale gas production, according to EIA.

The industry is interested

That production is comparable to the Haynesville production five years ago in the play that covers 9,000 square miles in western Louisiana, eastern Texas and southwestern Arkansas, where nearly 30 drilling companies are at work.

There are strong signs the industry is again interested in the Haynesville. The Haynesville rig count has jumped from 16 in April 2016, to 39 a year ago, to 54 as of May 11.

Chesapeake a big Haynesville player

Houston-based Tellurian has reportedly had discussions with Chesapeake Energy, one of the biggest players in the Haynesville Shale. Tellurian is interested in acquiring Haynesville gas assets for its planned Driftwood liquefied natural gas export facility at Lake Charles, La.

Chesapeake gets 25% of its natural gas production from the Haynesville, 833 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d), or 139,000 barrels of oil-equivalent per day (BOE/d), the Oklahoma-based company recently reported.

That production has jumped 22.1%, from 682 MMcf/d in Q1 2017.

It has three rigs at work in the Haynesville and expects to complete up to new 25 wells in full-year 2018.

A Chesapeake well in Louisiana’s DeSoto Parish is the top IP well in the Haynesville, producing 38.8 MMcf/d, according to media reports.

In 2017, Tokyo Gas acquired an interest in an E&P subsidiary of Castleton Commodities International that has significant acreage in the Haynesville. It was Tokyo Gas’ first equity investment in U.S. upstream assets.

Production in the Haynesville has jumped 25% from early 2016 to early 2018. That is more than the production increase of 20% in the same timeframe in the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, according to EIA.

Doug Lawler, Chesapeake Energy CEO, told Forbes magazine in a March 2017 article the Haynesville was “largely written off by industry two to three years ago, but it has reemerged stronger than ever.”

The payouts on such wells are very attractive, at $3 per thousand cubic feet of gas, observers have said.

Reasons for increased Haynesville production

The latest production boost of Haynesville gas is due to increased drilling activity, longer laterals, more fracturing stages and improved completion techniques, plus private equity investment and growing demand for U.S. shale gas.

Additional rigs came in, beginning in late 2016, and the Haynesville also started producing higher per-well initial production rates. Drilling operators have gone to tighter stage spacing and significantly increased the quantity of proppant used per well.

The initial Haynesville wells with 5,000-foot laterals have grown to laterals measuring 7,500 feet to 10,000 feet and more in length. The result is stronger Haynesville well economics.

http://www.kallanishenergy.com/2018/05/15/haynesville-shale-making-...

Views: 3092

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The laterals are coming from the same wellbore according to the permits.  On the plats they follow the same path exactly.  The wells are named 1H and 1HB for example.  The only one that has reported completion data is BP unit named Pluto.  They report 12000 per day from 1H and about 9000 from 1HB.  Looks like the same wellbore to me. They do call both Haynesville on the permits.  Look at the permits.  Look at the completion filings. I am not an expert like you guys.  I am just reading the Railroad Commission Reports.

If you look carefully at the coordinates the surface location on each permit will be separated by about 12 to 25 feet.  This is the distance the rig had to move from one well to the next.  The curve and other information in the directional survey will also be somewhat different (this is only in the completion packet).  

Ok. Thanks.  Just a mineral owner trying to figure out what I was seeing.  Hadn’t seen something like this before and was trying to interpret what the were doing.  Am I correct that these laterals are in 2 different formations.  Bossier and Haynesville?

Based on the H vs HB notation, yes, one is Haynesville and one is Bossier

Thanks for sharing your knowledge.  Have good evening.

We need an up vote thingy on here : ))

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service