Views: 51534

Replies to This Discussion

Does anyone have an opinion on which if any of these maps might be close to accurate?

I will post that the final 3D outline will be different from all of these outlines we have seen so far  

spoke to contracting group in Texas today and asked about discrepancy in acreage as posted in maps.   Reply was absolute that area and acreage was decreased from 1766 to 578 sq, miles.  CGG and Fairfield Geotechnologies are the 2 players involved and no confirmation on the major players or operators involved on financing the 3D shoot.  

$35 MM is a lot of money to de risk and optimize lateral locations.

Basically the cost of 3-4 wells.

A good use of capital if it leads to drilling less risky wells that avoid faults and can stay in the best target zones.

A good example of this is in the Eagle Ford trend - very expensive 3D seismic but when you are looking at 5 to 10 laterals per section (or 2 sections), easy to justify the costs.

I highly doubt that this I an effort to miss inform on purpose.

"Outlines" can vary depending on the actual factor each outline is addressing.

Is the outline that of the full fold 3D seismic coverage? Or is it the outline of the actual footprint of all the 3D sensors? Or one of many other options?

Note that the actual outline (and gaps in the data coverage) will change over time as surface permitting efforts are completed (or not completed).

It will be interesting to see how this all pans out over time.   Looks like at least Spring 2020 before all almost complete.

Permitting process is the big unknown now - how long will it take to get permits from all the surface owners - many of whom will have "restrictions" tied to water wells, buildings, trees, etc.

And how many will just not sign a permit???

FYI - permitting has been underway for about a year now.  I signed last August. 1 of the 2 parcels I’m associated with; had a permit for 1 year expiring 8/21.  I recently received a request to extend that permit through 12/31/20.  The 2nd tract’s permit extends through early 2020 so no request to extend yet.  In their correspondence; they stated that their recording crews would be on site late October this year.

Thx CM,  always good to hear sound concrete facts on the here and now of the developing play!!

Thanks CM for keeping all of us landowners well informed!

May have missed comments on this, but was wondering what the issues are with COP's-Soterra well as 6/10 and 6/17 reports show 'no drilling activity; temporarily suspended.

thanks-

There was a worker killed on the drill site.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service