Holding a Lease
Question... SWEPI has drilled about 20 wells, but not turned them to sales. As an example, the Calhoun well (sonris #238720) was spud in October 2008 (that's 14 months ago), and is "waiting on pipeline" according to sonris. I assume SWEPI must turn this well to production to hold the leases in force. Is that correct? How does this work for the mineral owners -- they get no royalties until production occurs. But must SWEPI start production before the primary term expires? Drilling the well is not enough to hold those leases, right?
I'm asking, because SWEPI has about 20 wells that have been drilled in the last year, but none has gone into production yet. And they have about 100 units that have yet to be drilled.
I'm asking, because SWEPI has about 20 wells that have been drilled in the last year, but none has gone into production yet. And they have about 100 units that have yet to be drilled.
Tags: HBP, SWEPI, production
Views: 36
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by olddog573 on
-
Swepi is not the only one. TMR exploration did the shallow horizontal skinner well Ser # 238007 in Belmont and it has not been turned to sales. Heard they were waiting for a pipeline to be laid from a Haynesville in the area. Also heard they had 2-3 years after the drilling was finished before they had to pay shut in fees.
-
Permalink Reply by Henry on
-
Harold,
Thanks. So even though sonris says something like "waiting on pipeline" or "wating on completion," these wells are treated as being shut-in. Is this right?
-
Permalink Reply by twomule on
-
XTO is doing the same thing with SN 238707. I wish someone would come in and actually DO something.
-
Permalink Reply by sesport on
-
Major pipeline approved by FERC in 2009 was much less than previous several years (not sure if this was due to lack of applications or turning them down, tho). Applications & approval for major pipelines are starting to pick up again ... much on the horizon. Can't get it all done in a day, just saying.
http://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/gen-info/horizon-pipe.pdf
Find the article titled "Finding Approval" that starts on p. 32 here...
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22045114/Pipeline-Construction-09-SEP-OCT...
80)
-
Permalink Reply by Henry on
-
sesport,
I would not mind my well not being turned to sales, with the price of gas so low. I was just wondering how SWEPI was managing to do this, contractually. It may turn out much better for all their mineral owners in the long run...
-
Permalink Reply by Henry on
-
Harold,
I'm not suggesting anything underhanded on the part of SWEPI. And I don't have any lease with them. I'm just curious how it works for the mineral owners, when the well isn't turned to sales. I always hear it takes production to hold a lease, so I was wondering what happens in these cases. That's all. Thanks for your insiights.
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
399 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
-
Franklin County, Texas
8 members
-
Rusk County
97 members
-
Vernon Parish
59 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
242 members
-
Sabine County, Texas
172 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
Angelina County, TX
87 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
