Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by ben walker on February 11, 2011 at 11:01

I had a visitor yesterday who told me there was activity going on at the site. Today I drove down for a look and there are a bunch of new items on site--look almost like the containers that are used for shipping stuff on ships. There are signs that a lot of traffic has been going in and out. My visitor also said there was a large crane on site but I did not see that today from the road.

Permalink Reply by ben walker on March 13, 2011 at 4:51

Update: About 3 weeks ago a sign "Flint Access Road" was posted on the turnoff from 21 on to my road. I could not find any new activity on my road so concluded this was for directions to the EOG well site. I did notice pickup traffic in and out so some kind of work was going on at the site. The sign was taken down few days ago so Flint seems to be gone. I did find some info on google for Flint but not sure what in particular they were doing. Just yesterday I happened to look out the window and saw a fleet of 5 large tanker trucks going out to the main highway. Not sure if they were hauling salt water or if they brought water in. Stay tuned...

Permalink Reply by RBH on January 25, 2011 at 10:30

3 unit declarations filed by Sonerra resources/Pinnacle Energy Group LLC for the Lone Wolf:

lone wolf	Dates:	12/07/1887 To 01/21/2011
Role:	Any	Town:	Any	Document Type:	Any

	Name	File Date	Grantor/Grantee	Number	Type Desc.	Inst. Date	# Pgs.	Book/Vol/Page
	LONE WOLF #1 GAS UNIT	12/11/2009 00:00:00	Grantee	146158	AMD UNIT DESIGNATION acres in unit 1058.4	12/11/2009	3	OPR/03177/215
	LONE WOLF #1 GAS UNIT	02/28/2007 00:00:00	Grantee	102710	AMD UNIT DESIGNATION	02/14/2007	13	OPR/02603/218
	LONE WOLF #1 GAS UNIT	01/05/2007 00:00:00	Grantee	100509	UNIT DESIGNATION with acres in unit: 1087.79 ACS	01/05/2007	6	OPR/02575/148

Permalink Reply by Jan Childress on January 25, 2011 at 14:19

Okay, this is curious. Is this saying there were three changes in the unit declarations for Lone Wolf?  I've got the first one 5/12/2006 for 693.2 acres and the second one 4/26/2007 for 1,058.4 acres. I wonder what the 12/11/2009 filing is about?

 

 

Permalink Reply by RBH on January 25, 2011 at 14:59

 

in www.texaslandrecords.com

 

1/5/07--unit 1087.79 acres   OPR/02575/148

4/26/07--I did not download -amend unit-OPR/02603/218

12/11/2009-- 1058.4 acres    OPR/03177/215

Permalink Reply by Jan Childress on January 27, 2011 at 3:51

Thanks RBH!!!  I'll note my observations in case any other Lone Wolf #1 folks are interested.

The first Lone Wolf survey of 693.2ac was filed 5/11/06 with RRC but not recorded. That survey was increased to 1087.79 acres and the Unit Designation was recorded 1/5/07. The properties were re-surveyed reducing the actual Lone Wolf Survey acreage to 1058.4 which was recorded on 2/28/2007 and is the survey on which payments are calculated. On 12/11/2009 the Second Unit Declaration was filed to add an owner lease and correct the lease description.    

 

 

Permalink Reply by GoRicky on January 27, 2011 at 9:13

Lack of regulatory oversight.  Some operators only turn in what they can get by with (RRC).  Some are deceptive - some sloppy & some are very prudent; but I think they pretty much all know the law, and I believe the law is that the Co. Records are "where it's at", especially for a pooled unit.  The RRC is shown one thing ...  It's a shame the law doesn't require the operator to send a copy of the unit designation when they mail out division orders.  That would answer a lot of questions for the mineral/royalty owners.  Also, you can search the Nac. Co. Records vicariously on Texas Land Records.com.  It's a buck-a-page for downloads of the filed instruments.  As to your last question - EOG could very well file its rendition of the largest unit Sonerra filed.

Permalink Reply by adubu on March 13, 2011 at 6:05

GoRicky--- if you are in the unit with your minerals you should request a copy of the unit plat along with total acres in the unit from the operator so you can use  to confirm your unit decimal interest. I have always been able to receive this on request.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page