Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Joe Aldridge on April 21, 2013 at 13:16

No, they don't have a crude pipeline to the well site. All of the crude in this area is trucked.

Permalink Reply by onesock73 on April 21, 2013 at 13:55

Is that about one truck per day?

Permalink Reply by Judy Floyd Brown on April 21, 2013 at 14:43

Yeah onesock73 I'm thinking one truck could handle it.

Permalink Reply by Joe Aldridge on April 21, 2013 at 14:44

About one truck load plus a little. How many tanks do they have on site? And are they production tanks or frack tanks? Is there a flare?

Permalink Reply by tc on April 21, 2013 at 14:54

200 barrels per day is much lower than the rumors of IPs in the 2800 per day.  I am hoping they are filling up production tanks while they line up more trucks.

Permalink Reply by Judy Floyd Brown on April 21, 2013 at 15:42

Picture attached. This was taken before they finished all the tanks and such

Attachments:

• image.jpg, 1.6 MB

Permalink Reply by Joe Aldridge on April 21, 2013 at 21:24

Judy,

With that many tanks the well could be producing more than 200 bbls a day. I don't see a flare. If the well is in production there would have to be a flare unless they have already hooked up to a NG line. When was this photo taken?

Permalink Reply by Dan Tanner on April 21, 2013 at 15:46

Thanks for the rapid replies.  I was also told that there were 3 (I think storage) tanks on the site.  Maybe tc is right and they're filling the tanks. Keeping my fingers crossed.

Any info on # 2 and the stuck coil.

Permalink Reply by Judy Floyd Brown on April 21, 2013 at 15:56

The picture I attached to my previous post shows at least 5 tanks.

Permalink Reply by dbob on April 21, 2013 at 16:19

P

Permalink Reply by Steve on April 22, 2013 at 9:03

The only thing I expect from this well is to find out if a lot of extra proppant (1 million lbs.per stage) helps increase the IP rate or not. This 1st well only has a 5500 ft. lateral with 18 stages - wells in this range have produced less than 1000 bopd so far. So, unless they hit a sweet spot or the 1 million lbs. of proppant per stage has a material effect on the IP rate, we should not expect to see but 1000 bopd or less from this well. IMO. The added proppant (750k lbs per stage on one well at least) did not seem to help on the last 2 Weyer wells. What is different with these Ash wells other than location and more proppant? Longer laterals may be the only answer - the next well has a longer lateral but, will they ever get the coil out of the line so we can find out ? I would not be a bit surprised if it takes Encana $25 - $30 million to find out on this well.

Permalink Reply by Bernell McGehee on April 22, 2013 at 9:45

I don't believe we have any official information, yet, on the Weyerhauser 60H wells.

Goodrich, who is neither the operator nor a participant in the well, posted an IP for 60H-1 of 1,100, and Tuscaloosa Trend posted an IP figure for 60H-2 of 288 barrels, but qualified it with it was a "before clean-up' amount. A tentative rounded number and a "before clean-up" number comes across as very iffy to me.

Encana will give their 1st quarter 2013 report tomorrow.  I'm hopeful we'll have official (and more reliable) results at this time.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page