Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on September 13, 2015 at 11:08

I expect the WH-1 and Allowable reports to be entered in SONRIS soon - possibly this week.  From the information I have, it's a good well.  I think it would make the bottom third of the best Terryville Complex wells.  And all those wells are very good wells (31.6 MMcfd to 14.8 MMcfd IP).

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on October 2, 2015 at 13:58

Taylor Etal 13-12H #2.

http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellinfo2...

Permalink Reply by Fred Baragona on October 14, 2015 at 4:01

Skip, not sure I understand the numbers?  Can you provide the daily or monthly production rate per MM BTU?

Thanks!

 

  

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on October 14, 2015 at 4:09

What numbers, Fred?

Permalink Reply by Fred Baragona on October 14, 2015 at 5:02

Skip, I followed a link you provided back on Oct. 2nd to state website on Taylor well info., and I thought it provided production info. that I did not understand, but maybe it was not production info. at all? 

 

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on October 14, 2015 at 5:07

The link in the discussion introduction above is to the WRM Taylor SONRIS Well File.  It contains no information at this time on completion or production data.

The Oct. 2nd. link is to the newly permitted Taylor #2 well.

Permalink Reply by Davis on October 14, 2015 at 5:18

I asked WH a few weeks ago why Taylor #1 hasn't been updated on Sonris and this was their reply.    

"I was told the reason no production information is visible is due to the fact that the well is a horizontal well that is producing from two different sections (12 & 13).  In this situation the state requires the production to be reported under two different LUW codes and due to limitations within the Sonris system, this cannot be displayed online."

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on October 14, 2015 at 5:26

Interesting.  That explanation doesn't ring true to me. I have been to the Shreveport District office and been told by the staffer in charge that WRM has not supplied certain required reports.  I'll cut and paste what they told you and ask the staffer what they think of that reply.

If you speak with the WRM rep again consider using the following.  WRM, when they were Wildhorse Resources, drill many wells that had perforated laterals in multiple sections.  Most of those wells have been reported although many have now been taken over by MRD Operating.  Here is an example of such a well.

http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellinfo2

I'll try to repost the link later when the database is working better.  For those who can use SONRIS Data Access it is:

246914

LCV RA SUPP;L MINERALS 19-30HC

001-ALT

Permalink Reply by Davis on October 14, 2015 at 5:34

Exactly. Sounded like complete BS to me.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on October 14, 2015 at 6:03

Davis, are you a mineral interest in the Taylor well?

Permalink Reply by Davis on October 14, 2015 at 6:20

Yes

Permalink Reply by Fred Baragona on October 14, 2015 at 5:46

Skip, is the Taylor #2 the new well being drilled just north of I-20 and just off Pipes Road?

If anyone ever gets any production info. on the Taylor #1 well, I would love to see it.

Thanks.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page