Laughable, "EPA Administrator Jackson confirmed an EPA analysis showing that unilateral U.S. action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions would have no effect on climate. Moreover, when presented with an EPA chart depicting that outcome, Energy Secretary Steven Chu said he disagreed with EPA’s analysis.

“I believe the central parts of the [EPA] chart are that U.S. action alone will not impact world CO2 levels,” Administrator Jackson said. http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/08/epa-admits-cap-and-trade-won’t-work/

Views: 440

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What's so interesting about cap and trade is that its a next step growth of the same system we used to mostly eradicate the acid rain problem a few years back. The emission credits program, as cap and trade was called then, was started by none other that George Bush the elder. And, even though businesses (mostly public utilities) said it would ruin them, it worked. It cost a few billion a year but probably saved 10 times that much from not polluting the atmosphere. You could probably say the same thing about unleade gasolene and the catalytic converter.

Cap and trade is a more ambitious program to be sure, but I don't understand why people think that American business is not innovative and smart enough to adapt to it and eventually learn how to make a profit on it. Are we just not as smart as we used to be? I wonder.
Bill the point is man is not causing global warming, we did cause acid rain. 10,000 year ago was the ice age wooly mam's and all that, it has been warming ever sense, there were no cars and not that many people back then. If you look at history there have been many times when it was ice ages or tropical climates and man was not the cause of them. Global warming is a good thing if we had and some scientist beleave we are going into a cooling period that would be a lot worse.
If you're right about global warming then I agree that CO2 cap and trade is an unnecessary expense. A lot of people think global warming is a problem that has to be fixed. Honestly, I don't know who is right and at the end of the day I won't be around when the question is finally answered but until then, I tend to agree with the scientists who say it is a problem. I look at the dwindling icebergs, the new sea lanes in the Artic Ocean etc., which make me think it is getting warmer, but I will concede these may be just part of a cycle. I did read the other day that the Exxon's CEO kinda sorta agreed with global warming but he wants carbon credits rather than cap and trade. What do you make of that?
Thousands of scientists including EPA experts and world renowned climatologists do not think it is a problem, which scientists do you believe? While the arctic ice has receded the antarctic caps have increased over 37% in size since 1981, you will never hear this mentioned by anthro supporters, they only bring up the arctic. Record cooling has occured this summer throughout North America and hundreds of record low temperatures have been shattered.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service