There's a pretty good article here in Scientific American October 2009.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=squeezing-more-oil...

It discusses a number of reasons about how we may not be reaching peak oil any time soon. It points out that current extraction methods only extract 30% or so of the oil in the ground and discusses ways that may extract a larger percentage of the oil underground. It also discusses that we're extracting oil from areas that weren't economical to drill before, and areas that haven't been explored due to better drilling technology.

I'm a little surprised that they published this. In the past decade or so, Scientific American should have been called Peseudoscientific Treehugging American Propaganda.

They didn't even throw in a line about "this means we need more government action to curb CO2 emission because we're not really running out of oil.

Views: 129

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yes, US production has long since peaked, but world production continues to rise.

...and I've got oceanfront property in Arizona......
replies to this scientificamerican article from a very respectible website, with many geologists and petroleum engineers, The Oil Drum (TOD):

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/5811#comments_top

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service