Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on February 27, 2010 at 22:16

So...2nd grid plus 3rd grid equals 1st grid???

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 28, 2010 at 4:37

SB, absolutely correct.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by sesport on February 28, 2010 at 2:11

Thanks yet again, Les. These graphic representations make it sooo much easier for some of us to retain & recall information like this. Some of you guys do an excellent job IMHO. (Then I don't have to ask redundant questions. lol) That's why I like EIA's and FERC's and others' sites so much.

Any idea where I might find good graphic representations for the proportional differences in mcf, mmcf, bcf and tcf? Or the differences in the amount of ng that are equivalent to a barrel of oil?

80)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 28, 2010 at 5:07

Sesport, I reckon it is too early in the morning but I cannot quite comprehend your question.

For the later question if you asking about a straight conversion, based on EIA info ~ 5.6 - 5.8 Mcf natural gas per barrel of crude oil on an energy basis.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Linda Blunt on February 28, 2010 at 4:00

Thank you Les for these wonderful graphics! Can you answer a question about the third grid? Does this graphic show the number of permits that have been obtained but not drilled as of yet?

LP

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 28, 2010 at 4:53

Linda, the third grid shows the number of Haynesville Units (sections) that do not contain either a drilled Haynesville Shale well or a well permit.

For example, T14N-R14W has 33 sections that are unitized for the Haynesville. Of those units (sections), 19 have either a drilled Haynesville Shale well or a well permit for a Haynesville Shale well. The remaining 14 units do not have even a permitted Haynesville Shale well. I hope that helps.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Linda Blunt on March 1, 2010 at 0:07

Thank you very much! Les, you are very much appreciated!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RAZORBACK on February 28, 2010 at 5:25

Les

Should the following wells and units be included in your layout?

SERIAL NO (COMPLETED)
239898
CV RA SU14;CLEMENTS HEIRS 18 16-JUN-09 018-23N-14W MISSIONARY LAKE, NORTH 11500

SERIAL NO (DRILLING)
240503
MISSION PLANTATION 18 H 24-NOV-09 019-23N-14W MISSIONARY LAKE, NORTH 12468

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 28, 2010 at 5:29

Razorback, generally it is believed that wells and units in that area would be Hyanesville Sand rather than Haynesville Shale. Of course, later information could show that be incorrect. Time will tell.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RAZORBACK on February 28, 2010 at 6:18

LES,
THANKS.
ONE WELL (239898) WAS COMPLETED AT 12245'

LATEST SCOUT INTFO:
COMPLETED 10-2-09; NON-UNIT CV; 600 MCFD; 250 BCD; 16/64 CHOKE; 44 GVTY; 320# FP; PERFS 10,640-12,101' MD; 10,171-10,191' TVD

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by drilltheshale on February 28, 2010 at 10:40

Thanks a bunch, Les.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Suzan on February 28, 2010 at 14:45

What do the colors represent?

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page