Lawsuit Claim: Chesapeake's negligence to blame in well blowout death?

Lawsuit: Chesapeake's negligence to blame in well blowout death

By Vickie Welborn • vwelborn@gannett.com • April 6, 2010


Chesapeake Energy's refusal to take precautions to control the pressure of one of its natural gas wells in Grand Cane led to a blowout in November that killed one man and seriously injured another, the men's relatives claim in a lawsuit filed in a Texas federal court.

 

Killed in the Nov. 18 accident was James Dennis, 58, of Bullard, Texas. Critically injured was co-worker Jimmy Siler, 30, also of Bullard. Both were employed with Dynasty Transportation LLC, of Broussard, which provides truck transportation for the oil and gas industry.

In addition to the death and injury, the blowout sent approximately 15 families away from their homes for two days. Several DeSoto Fire District 8 firefighters were treated and released for respiratory problems after rescuing Dennis and Siler from the well location on George Hunt Road.

Dennis' wife, Barbara Dennis, along with two daughters, Jill and Lauren, and Siler named Chesapeake as the defendant in the personal injury and wrongful death petition filed last month in the Eastern District of Texas. They seek unspecified damages and a jury trial.

"It is not our policy to comment on pending litigation," said J. Kevin McCotter, Chesapeake's senior director of corporate development.

The lawsuit alleges Dennis and Siler were working as crane truck operators at the well site along with contractors Innovative Wellsite Systems Inc. and JetBlast. Innovative employees were directed by Chesapeake to change out the pins on the wellhead.

Dennis and Siler hooked the crane truck to the equipment at the wellhead to allow Innovative workers to change the pins, "when suddenly a violent explosion occurred and the wellhead blew out," the lawsuit states.

Dennis and Siler were in the path of the blowout. Both suffered broken bones and critical injuries. Dennis died at the scene.

"Prior to beginning the work, Innovative employees spoke with the Chesapeake company man on location and requested Chesapeake to 'kill the well' by placing a down hole packer because of the high pressure on the well," according to the lawsuit. "Chesapeake refused to take the time to do so and wanted Innovative to continue the work with the lubricator which was set. A down hole packer would have kept the pressure of the well down hole and away from the wellhead where the work was being performed. Chesapeake's refusal to set the packer allowed the pressure to stay near the wellhead, and thus allowed the wellhead to blow through one of the pins being set by Innovative."

The plaintiffs claim Dennis' death and Siler's injury occurred because Chesapeake did not take steps to control the gas in the well by "holding it down hole."

References also are made in the document to other blowouts at Chesapeake well sites in the Haynesville Shale region, particularly in DeSoto Parish. Four men have died in rig-related accidents since the shale play hit the region two years ago.

 

Buck

Views: 1014

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Were any of the landowners named in the suit? My interest is to see how protected the leasee's are against liability
All leasees should be completely insulated from litigation from my understanding. I would like to hear our experts opinions concerning UMI's and WIP's in this scenario. I would think most of the liability in this case would fall upon the subcontractor, Innovative.
UMIs have no exposure because UMIs have no control. The typical lessor also has no control and, therefore, no liability. Naturally, a particular lease may have other language giving lessor more control and therefore potentially some exposure. Having said that, you can sue god if you can effect service. WIs potentially have exposure, but it's addressed in JOAs. E&P, Incs. contract out drilling work for a reason.
"The typical lessor also has no control and, therefore, no liability."

--

I guess my interest was, given the potentials for individual landowners (leasees) to make gobs of money, would there be more drive by the unscrupulous to file a suit against the landowner thereby causing the landowner to have to fight out a frivolous suit -- due to circumstances that were, surely, out of their control. Yet requiring them to retain counsel thus have substantial monetary losses.

I know, it's a bit "sci-fi" but as a great future alien has said "there are always possibilities". Especially if one lives long enough to prosper from this round of NGas (and hopefully wildly wallet-fattening royalties).

See where I am going with this? I just wonder if anyone has had to deal with crazies with dollars signs in their eyes.
as the old adage goes, you can sue god if you can make service
lol. true. true.
Most of the comments to this post either (1) attack the messenger, "The Shreveport Times," which is but one of many Gannet publications, such as USA Today, and none of which publications even pretend to contain in-depth news journalism or editorials, or (2) blindly attack the families of the deceased.
As to the former, subscribe to a better print newspaper and also take advantage of online news services. As to the latter, just what is the point?
When a work accident occcurs and folks are maimed or killed, it's possible it truly was an accident, with no negligence or malfeasance at all, whether on the part of a person or a defective piece of equipment, and it's also possible negligence or some other malfeasance in fact was involved. Given drilling inately is dangerous, reasonable precautions should be extensive. If extensive safety precautions are not the norm, it is foreseeable an 'accident' will occur and therefore unreasonable.
What happened or didn't happen in the referenced matter is not known. As facts develop, a better reasoned discussion can occur and hopefully will.
more than likely this is just Morris Bart style ambulance chasing.
I felt like I needed to alter the title of the post to "Lawsuit Claim: Chesapeake's negligence to blame in well blowout death?" - for those that might not actually read the article. Excellent job of tainting the jury pool.
it was posted here as it was titled in the The Shreveport Times
Keith - Surely you're not suggesting that any jury pool wouldn't have the intelligence or education to filter media bias??? BTW, I think I just heard from a friend in Trinidad that mass e-mailings on the internet are warning of an outbreak of "omnipotentitis," it's thought this is a malady to do with a swelling of the head. The CDC should be making an announcement, vaccines & anitdotes may soon be distributed so that the masses can rest assured their tax dollars are being put to good use. Of course, there is another rumor that the antidote is nothing more than asprin, and so a waste of tax-payers' dollars. Go figure? Darned if they do, darned if they don't. lol

80)
Just saying that plaintiff's attorneys will utilize any PR they can muster to bring them a huge contingency payday, oops I mean, justice...

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service