Thanks to all of you on this site who have so generously contributed your knowledge and expertise since the Haynesville play began. This site and the dialogue has been more helpful than most any other resource around.

Now to my question.Currently I have some property in Texas on which I own the surface rights only. A seismic company has requested the right to perform seismic operations on it, for which they offered $15/ acre and a 2 year contract. I have refused and certainly don't want to grant access to my property for 24 months at any cost. Now I'm told they can get a court order to force the issue. Is that so?

Views: 127

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Those terms are very standard for a seismic permit. The reason that it has a 2 year term is that the company will likely permit a large number of square miles of permits before they can acquire the data. In other words, don't think of them having access every day for 2 years. When it is time to acquire the seismic, they will be on your property for only a few days.
As to getting a court order: If you have both the surface rights AND 100% of the mineral rights, you can refuse the permit and access. However, if someone else has even 1% of the mineral rights, they have the right to exploit those minerals and thus automatically have the right to access your property. If that law wasn't in place, no mineral/oil&gas operations would probably ever get done because every landowner would like their privacy and never let anyone else on their property.
If you have animals, lakes or security concerns, add an addendum which lists which gates/roads access points you want to be used. Also figure out a reasonable compensation for damages due to trucks making ruts etc. If you have a very large ranch (1 mile across or more) and access to a geological/geophysical interpreter, you could even ask for a copy of the data across your property. Normally this request is useless because it is like the old blind man evaluating an elephant story, you don't know if you are looking at a trunk or a tail.
Will also depend on how minerals were reserved, ie. with surface access or without surface access. disclaimer, I am not an attourney, therefore do not depend on my advise as law.
Thanks, Pauln and Mike, for your responses. The mineral leases that rule the property are at least 60 years old and grant "to the Lessee the right to explore for mineral indications, and to employ therein the Torsion Balance, Seismograph, or other device or method, and with the right of operating for and producing therefrom oil, gas etc......."

Oh well, I've learned that I am just a co-owner of the property, along with the descendants of the original mineral owners, and a secondary one at that.
While I'm not a lawyer, my guess would still be the same. The other 50% of the minerals could agree to sign the permit because they have rights to have their minerals explored. Get with that other 50% and see what they want to do.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service