Is there anyway to compare these two wells? Or would it be to indepth?
Discussion at our office, which one is producing better,,,,we are not in agreement.
COMPLETED 8-18-11; GAS; HAYNESVILLE RA; 7784 MCFD; 14/64 CHOKE; 158 BWD; 7690# FP; 85# CP; PERFS 12,525-17,034' MD Well # 242358
COMPLETED 1-17-11; GAS; HAYNESVILLE RA; 14,064 MCFD; 22/64 CHOKE; 647 BWD; 7330# FP; 3060# CP; PERFS 12,300-14,951' MD Well #239994
Tags:
Smith,
Based on the IP rate of each well and the percentage of choke, rather than size in inches. And the flowing pressures being so near equal, it was not figured in. Here is what each well would have produced on the other wells choke.
Well #1, Actual IP : 7784 MCFD; 14/64 choke. Estimated IP on 22/64 choke of well #2: ~12,237 MCFD
Well #2, Actual IP: 14,064 MCFD; 22/64 choke. Estimated IP on 14/64 choke of well #1: ~8968 MCFD
5 members
7 members
386 members
5 members
247 members
401 members
5 members
11 members
360 members
689 members
In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near…
ContinuePosted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
© 2025 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com