I live in Michigan and recently inherited some land in Claiborne Parrish (see below). Does anyone here have property near me that has been leased? If yes, at what terms?
Any and all assistance and information will be greatly appreciated.
Sec 29, T 20N, R 6W 1 acre
Sec 12, T 19N, R 7W 50 acres
Sec 4, T22N, R8W (undivided 1/2 interest of 60 acres)
Claiborne Parish
I have not yet been contacted with any lease offers. I just talked to the tax assessors office and they told me that when a company is ready to drill in your area they will contact you. Is this the standard procedure? Please excuse my ignorance, I am glad I found this site.
THANKS!
Michael
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Michael on December 6, 2010 at 9:16
Permalink Reply by JB on May 15, 2012 at 8:54 Not sure about the leasing in your area but I did see drilling permits for two Lisbon Field wells on the DNR website. One was in Sec 17 T21N R4W(Smackover zones A&B), the other was in Sec 36 T21N R5W (Vaughn Sand).
Permalink Reply by Andrew on August 12, 2012 at 13:08 Michael,
what the tax assessor told you is correct: they will contact you if they want to lease your minerals. Contacting a company about leasing land that size would just indicate that you are motivated in the event they were interested.
Permalink Reply by Michael on August 28, 2012 at 10:23 Additional information on the lease offer:
"This lease is based on a $300 per net mineral acre bonus for a 3 year primary term with an option to extend the primary term 4 more years for 300 per net mineral acre and this lease provides for a 1/5th royalty."
SECTION 4 - TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH - RANGE 8 WEST
Is this a good lease and has anyone else received lease offers in this section?
Thanks, Mike
Mike,
I think there have been offers for a little more bonus and royalty in that area. I believe better tems as well. Aubrey Sanders Jr. might have more info. I think you might get more responses if you post in the Brown Dense forum. I was offered the same tems as you in Feb of 2011. I am in 6 23n 6w.
Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on August 28, 2012 at 12:03 IMO it would be a mistake to attribute all the leasing activity in Townships 23N & 22N in Claiborne Parish to the Brown Dense. There are other companies with leasing efforts underway in this area and I doubt that their interest is the Brown Dense.
From another thread:
Permalink Reply by Michael on August 28, 2012 at 16:31 Thanks for replying gentlemen.
Skip, the landman states he is representing Miller Land. Can you please check how many leases have been filed in this area and any other information that you may be able to gather?
Also, can you recommend a good O&G attorney that knows the 4 22n 8w area?
Thank you so much for all your help!!
Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on August 29, 2012 at 1:10 Michael, I don't have access to Claiborne Parish records at this time. Miller Land Professionals appeared late in our discussions and generally further south than your location. Since late June they have filed 19 leases or memos of lease in Union Parish in middle to lower section rows of 21N 4W & 3W. They haven't assigned any of those leases to an operating energy company at this time.
Randy Davidson (Davidson, Jones & Summers) in Shreveport. 318-424-4342.
Permalink Reply by Michael on March 13, 2013 at 7:42 Update:
I now have a lease contract for sec 4/22/8 @ 400 acre and 25% (not signed yet and negotiated up from 300/20%) and now have papers from Geokinetics for a seismograph survey @ 15 acre (also unsigned). Is anyone else receving offers such as these?
Can someone read into this and give me an educated opinion as to how I should proceed? I've looked at the archives and see that general consensus on the survey is 25 acre is the going rate, however these discussions are from 3-4 years ago and a different county. Is there a "going rate" for this area and for this time period?
Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on March 13, 2013 at 7:50 The bonus and royalty are good offers based on your acreage. The remaining lease terms are important also and should be taken into consideration. The seismic permit offer is the usual. You could negotiate and possibly get a little more but the dollar differential is inconsequential. What is more important are the damage terms.
Permalink Reply by Michael on March 13, 2013 at 8:04 Thanks Skip, I value your opinion highly. In fact I did have Randy Davidson (per your rec)review the original lease offer and he added additional clauses re damage, timber, water, etc. that was accepted.
Re the seismic permit, the payout is so low it would not benefit me to use an attorney. Should I ask for higher per acre and what types of clauses should I include to mitigate damages possibly done to the land or timber?
12 members
456 members
10 members
405 members
17 members
248 members
8 members
67 members
301 members
121 members
In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near…
ContinuePosted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com