All things, people, companies, places & geology related to the Haynesville Shale play in Webster Parish.
Location: Webster, LA
Members: 300
Latest Activity: Sep 14, 2023
Started by Gary Griffith. Last reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Sep 14, 2023.
Started by Gary Griffith. Last reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Dec 3, 2021.
Started by Terry Johnston. Last reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Aug 6, 2021.
Started by Francis Mayo. Last reply by Paul M. Hernenko Mar 16, 2014.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Feb 25, 2014.
Started by gary. Last reply by Andrew Sep 24, 2013.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Jul 31, 2013.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Aubrey C. Sanders, Jr. Apr 10, 2013.
Started by Cynthia Garrison Payne. Last reply by Aubrey C. Sanders, Jr. Mar 28, 2013.
Started by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant. Last reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Jun 12, 2012.
Add a Comment
lee, there is no completion or production data as yet entered in the database. Do you know if the wells have been fracked? And, if so when?
Skip
Can you tell me how much these wells are making a day
Ensight IV
HA RA SU71; Roy 7-6 H #1
Sligo Field
Sec. 18-T17N-R11W SN 252467
Bossier Parish, LA
and
Ensight IV
HA RA SU71; Roy 7-6 H #2
Sligo Field
Sec. 18-T17N-R11W SN 252468
Bossier Parish, LA
Ensight has been very quite and are drilling some very good haynesville shale wells.
Not sure if Skip is looking at the right Township Range, I don't see any active well producing from any of those sections and all have major Haynesville potential. $500-$750 is not a good offer.
Comstock drilling immediate offset from Sec 2-16-10 up through 35 and 26.
http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellinfo2...
Go east there and you have some big wells from Comstock.
EnSight is a Haynesville player by the way.
Ok, lee, Correction. This seemed not to make sense so I checked again. There is a well in Section 33 but that is the surface location and the well is producing from Section 28 to the north. So this is a relatively newly formed unit combining Section 33 with the section immediately to the south, Section 4 - 16N-10W. Sorry for the confusion. I still think you should ask Mr. Tuminello who he is leasing form Good luck.
Those would likely be top leases but go ahead and ask Mr. Tuminello who he is leasing for. BPX has sufficient current production to be holding all the existing leases in Section 33 for some time to come. Anyone who is burdened by an existing lease can not sign a new lease but they can sign a "top lease". You might also ask Mr. Tuminello about top leases and how his may work for any current BPX mineral lessors or unleased mineral owners. I assure you that the majority of mineral owners in Section 33 are under a currently active lease.
I'm not sure what is happening in Section 33, over 2/3's of the Section has signed new leases with Platte and a very experienced landman named Ron Tuminello is handling the leasing.
There is a BPX Haynesville unit well in Section 33. I suspect your mother's acreage is modest and she has been an unleased mineral interest in that original well. BPX has applied to the state to approve spacing for 3 additional wells to produce from Section 33 and Section 28. I'd ask Platte Energy if they are leasing on behalf of BPX. My suspicion is that BPX is attempting to clean up any unleased mineral rights in their units that will receive new wells in the near future. The company has been sued over improper deductions from the proportional production attributable to unleased owners in all their operated units.
If I'm right about her acreage being modest in size, I'd shoot for at least a 20% royalty. It is unlikely that there will be any competition for leases in this area although Aethon and Ensight might have an interest. I usually like for mineral owners to be leased to the unit operator but the bottom line is that the operator must comply with the lease terms regardless of the lessee. I would expect a bonus in the neighborhood of $500 to $750 per acre but that is the lesser important lease term. Get the best royalty you can. On a small acreage, I'd give up 100% of the bonus for a bump in the royalty fraction as this is a proven location with multiple wells to come. Good luck.
Platte has bought several leases in 33-17-10, 34-17-10, 27-17-10 and assigned to Ensight IV
33-17-10
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com
You need to be a member of Webster Parish to add comments!