Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on March 23, 2009 at 15:17

Your welcome, sesport. I haven't given any thought to the reporting. I've been too busy trying to track down the heirs of the original owners of the land to see if they wish to assert a claim. And looking for a deed with a mineral reservation. That's got to be some good shale under Barksdale. LOL

Permalink Reply by sesport on March 23, 2009 at 15:45

Skip - Hellloooo ... over here responding to your post below re. heirs. You were left without a reply button.

Did you mean you're looking for heirs to the BAFB property? If so, I'd think you've got a task on your hands.

BTW, congrats for 100+ responses ... so far. :0) sesport

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Catfish on March 23, 2009 at 2:01

18n 12w sections 13,14,15,16 pre app. dated Feb. 18. Hearing was held 3-20
CHK forming Hayn. units.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on March 23, 2009 at 2:38

Hey, Catfish. I haven't seen this HA application appear on the public hearing schedule. Are you referring to a "pre-hearing conference" that was held on 3-20? As opposed to the public hearing in Baton Rouge? These are the first sections applied for in 18N-12W. If you have a copy of the application and can upload it, I'm sure there are quite a few members who would find it of interest. Thanks for the heads up. Skip

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Catfish on March 23, 2009 at 2:57

Yes it was pre -application conference held at the Petroleoum Club on 3/20. I will try and upload later. I wonder if anyone knows the result, I have property in section 13 waiting for the drill bit!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on March 23, 2009 at 3:02

Catfish. You might also post on the Bossier Parish Group page if you have not done so already. If any "interested party" attended the pre-conference meeting, you are likely to find them there.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Catfish on March 25, 2009 at 5:42

http://www.east80oilandgas.com/Forced_Pooling.htm

This a summary of the pre- hearing conference if anyone is intrested.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Catfish on March 25, 2009 at 7:04

Eric Clark is the one that attended for East 80 and wrote the summary. I don't know if they are wanting to block this or not. If they are, what are their chances?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on March 25, 2009 at 11:38

Mr. Clark may have good intentions but he is in way over his head here. I respectfully suggest that the East 80 O&G group retain a good O&G attorney.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on March 25, 2009 at 12:00

I mean no disrespect to Mr. Clark but it is evident from his report that he is not sufficiently knowledgeable to represent what I suspect is a fairly large group of mineral owners. At this point in the play, it should be evident that professional assistance is worth every penny paid and lack of same leads to disappointing results.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jordan A. Reamer on March 22, 2009 at 2:58

I would like to know when T6 in Sabine Parish is going to have any unit applications; there has been leasing activity in Sabine County, Tx. right across the lake but none in my area (Sec. 23, T6N, 13W).

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on March 22, 2009 at 4:10

Mr. Reamer. You are a little too far south at this point in the Haynesville Shale play time line. The leasing activity in Sabine County may or may not be HS related. I am not a geologist. From what I have heard though, the southern half of Sabine and Natchitoches parishes are not geologically consistent as the formations are folded and displaced. This area is where the stratigraphic zones of NW LA. meet those of SW LA. and the collision of the two causes this disruption.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• …
• 13
• Next ›
• Page