Natural gas incentives up against coal

A natural gas-powered electricity-generating plant

President Obama is expected to unveil a proposal to encourage coal-burning power plants to switch to natural gas. But while prices for natural gas are dropping and it's still a cleaner option, coal is still cheaper. John Dimsdale reports.

A natural gas-powered electricity-generating plant in Middletown, Conn. (Stan Honda/AFP/Getty Images)

More on Sustainability, Copenhagen

TEXT OF STORY

Steve Chiotakis: President Obama addresses the nation's top CEOs at a business roundtable meeting scheduled later today. He's expected to roll out a proposal to incentivize coal-burning power plants to switch to natural gas. From Washington, Marketplace's John Dimsdale reports.


John Dimsdale: Natural gas burns much more cleanly than coal, and new technologies have uncovered domestic reserves of gas. Prices have been coming down.

Steve Nadel at the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy says gas-fired utility plants are becoming more attractive.

Steve Nadel: From an efficiency point of view, the gas would be better. But we do have lots of coal and there's a lot of political implications about where the gas comes from. So it gets pretty complicated.

Coal is still cheaper than gas, and coal means lots of jobs for economically-depressed parts of the country, like Appalachia.

Energy analyst Bob Lee with Charles River Associates says rightly or wrongly, the president's picking a winner and a loser.

Bob Lee: If the economics were such that gas was superior, the government wouldn't have to step in in that case. So the fact that the government has to step in and try to push producers toward gas and away from coal means there is an economic cost to be paid somewhere.

Big oil companies would be among the winners. They've invested a lot in the future of domestic natural gas.

 

Buck

Views: 9

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This sounds like a really big deal. Post the results of the meeting if you get them, please, and thanks for this post.
Thanks Buck. It will be nice to actually see some movement/action in this direction.

Here's a few more related features:

Obama Mounts a Last-Ditch Attempt to Pass a 'Hybrid' Climate and Energy Bill
Published: February 22, 2010

http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/02/22/22climatewire-obama-mounts-...


Obama’s Proposal Could Be a Win for Natural Gas ETFs
February 24, 2010 at 12:00 pm by Tom Lydon

http://www.etftrends.com/2010/02/obamas-proposal-could-win-natural-...fr
color me surprised.
i also note that after reading the NYT article they focus solely on the CO2 advantages of NG over coal, and fail to mention the elimination of SO2, mercury, particulate soot, etc etc etc
unfortunately any energy news seems to be getting completely overshadowed by the buildup to the healthcare theater, one wonders at the timing of any such announcement of support, however vague, for a fossil fuel.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service