Lawsuit Claim: Chesapeake's negligence to blame in well blowout death?

Lawsuit: Chesapeake's negligence to blame in well blowout death

By Vickie Welborn • vwelborn@gannett.com • April 6, 2010


Chesapeake Energy's refusal to take precautions to control the pressure of one of its natural gas wells in Grand Cane led to a blowout in November that killed one man and seriously injured another, the men's relatives claim in a lawsuit filed in a Texas federal court.

 

Killed in the Nov. 18 accident was James Dennis, 58, of Bullard, Texas. Critically injured was co-worker Jimmy Siler, 30, also of Bullard. Both were employed with Dynasty Transportation LLC, of Broussard, which provides truck transportation for the oil and gas industry.

In addition to the death and injury, the blowout sent approximately 15 families away from their homes for two days. Several DeSoto Fire District 8 firefighters were treated and released for respiratory problems after rescuing Dennis and Siler from the well location on George Hunt Road.

Dennis' wife, Barbara Dennis, along with two daughters, Jill and Lauren, and Siler named Chesapeake as the defendant in the personal injury and wrongful death petition filed last month in the Eastern District of Texas. They seek unspecified damages and a jury trial.

"It is not our policy to comment on pending litigation," said J. Kevin McCotter, Chesapeake's senior director of corporate development.

The lawsuit alleges Dennis and Siler were working as crane truck operators at the well site along with contractors Innovative Wellsite Systems Inc. and JetBlast. Innovative employees were directed by Chesapeake to change out the pins on the wellhead.

Dennis and Siler hooked the crane truck to the equipment at the wellhead to allow Innovative workers to change the pins, "when suddenly a violent explosion occurred and the wellhead blew out," the lawsuit states.

Dennis and Siler were in the path of the blowout. Both suffered broken bones and critical injuries. Dennis died at the scene.

"Prior to beginning the work, Innovative employees spoke with the Chesapeake company man on location and requested Chesapeake to 'kill the well' by placing a down hole packer because of the high pressure on the well," according to the lawsuit. "Chesapeake refused to take the time to do so and wanted Innovative to continue the work with the lubricator which was set. A down hole packer would have kept the pressure of the well down hole and away from the wellhead where the work was being performed. Chesapeake's refusal to set the packer allowed the pressure to stay near the wellhead, and thus allowed the wellhead to blow through one of the pins being set by Innovative."

The plaintiffs claim Dennis' death and Siler's injury occurred because Chesapeake did not take steps to control the gas in the well by "holding it down hole."

References also are made in the document to other blowouts at Chesapeake well sites in the Haynesville Shale region, particularly in DeSoto Parish. Four men have died in rig-related accidents since the shale play hit the region two years ago.

 

Buck

Views: 1013

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

LOL, been saving up for me, have you? If you don't want your words to haunt you ... oh, wait, did I learn that tactic from you?

re. "i just don't think the answer is to declare all companies evil while clamping down on their windpipes ever more tightly."

I've never said any such thing, in fact one of my previous posts on this thread states, "To be fair..."

And you selectively ignore my statement/position ...

"The responsible party, if there is one, in the coal mine incident will best be determined through an impartial process designed to ensure fair & balanced treatment of the matter."

You know, the Constitution, Bill of Rights, etc., etc., all that you hold so dear & fear being trampled.

Look at the size of this crawfish, Ma!!! 80)
yes. the govt should be responsible for not outlawing coal yesterday. And it is responsible for letting that mine stay open notwithstanding the clear and present danger it posed to the lives of the miners.
Bottom line is coal sucks.
Coal is very important to our economy, like it or not. I know we would all like to see our NG prices go up, but we must think about the greater good of the economy and not our pocket books sometimes.
coal serves no useful purpose whatsoever. Balance the good against the bad and there ya go.
The coal mine inspectors are not out to award blue stars, they are out to find as many problems/potential problems as possible. You see the same thing in hospital and food service inspections.

The bottom line is that coal mining is dangerous. Oil and Gas exploration is dangerous. However, both are exponitially safer now.
but coal exploration, production, and burning is disgustingly nasty.
I think we need to get the O&G out of the wild West/robber baron era. We've been drilling wells for over 100 years. We should know how to do things better by now.

We let them operate drilling rigs like some sort of emergency operations that have never been done before. They run outdated rigs. They put men in harms way when proper design of equipment, processes, and automation could keep people out of harms way. Operations are done with a "damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead" attitude. Everything is done in panic mode. Panic mode kills people.

Whether or not the claims made in this suit are true, does anyone have any difficulty believing that the operating companies have a reluctance to do the safe thing if it costs schedule time and money?
Yes, I do. I fully believe the Operators attempt to balance speed and safety.
hear, hear.

wrongdoing should be convicted with due process in a court of law, not the court of public opinion.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service