Replies to This Discussion

landownerPermalink Reply by Big Daddy, bcnr on September 26, 2008 at 23:32

Linda, I'd love to request and attend a conference but I'm in Illinois and a trip down there is not doable at this time. Just thought someone had received one of these notices recently.Thanks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Snake Stewart on September 27, 2008 at 2:37

That is a nice bit of info Ms. Gray. I didnt realize that the phone patch was an option. This should certainly make it easier for people to be a part of this process.

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Big Daddy, bcnr on September 27, 2008 at 15:09

Good idea Linda, I wasn't aware that was an option. I will certainly explore that idea. I'll keep y'all posted. Thanks, Cannie

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Foxiecajun on September 28, 2008 at 1:49

I am wondering why one well covers so many sections? Maybe that is a whole field?

• ▶ Reply

landownerPermalink Reply by Big Daddy, bcnr on September 28, 2008 at 12:43

Foxy, after re-reading it, my take on the notice is that the well specified is simply where EXCO is designating the depths of the HS. The also sent a correction letter as to which well they are refering to. Therefore any well within that depth zone will be designated a HS well. All above that will be Cotton Valley wells. They include 8 sections if my memory serves me correctly (I forgot the notice @ work) that are all in the Kingston Field. It also appears EXCO has a strong leasehold in these sections and therefore would be the primary operator. Perhaps this is a step to start production of the HS in those areas. I'm also curious as to the depths. As I recall, it gave ~a 3000 ft. range. Can I assume you received the pre-ap notice as well? Perhaps some of the GHS experts can weigh in and give us some insight. Cannie

• ▶ Reply