Driller denies that it contaminated Texas aquifer - EPA Makes Aggressive Move

Posted as an FYI:

Driller denies that it contaminated Texas aquifer


By RAMIT PLUSHNICK-MASTI Associated Press © 2010 The Associated Press

Dec. 7, 2010, 8:44PM

HOUSTON — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued an emergency order against a Texas gas driller Tuesday, accusing the company of contaminating an aquifer and giving it 48 hours to provide clean drinking water to affected residents and begin taking steps to resolve the problem.
 

The order is unprecedented in Texas, partly because the federal body overstepped the state agency responsible for overseeing gas and oil drilling in the state. The EPA's move could ratchet up a bitter fight between Texas and the EPA that has evolved in the past year from a dispute over environmental issues into a pitched battle over states rights.

 

EPA regional director Al Armendariz said he issued the order against Range Resources of Fort Worth, Texas, because he felt the Texas Railroad Commission was not responding quickly enough to contamination found in two water wells belonging to Parker County residents in North Texas.

The EPA began inspecting the wells in August after receiving complaints from residents who said the Texas commission and Range Resources had not responded to problems they were having with their drinking water. The EPA inspected the wells with the commission, Armendariz said, and found high levels of explosive methane, as well as other contaminants, including cancer-causing benzene.

"We thought what we found in the homes was alarming," Armendariz told The Associated Press.

Range Resources on Tuesday denied being the source of the contamination.

 

"We've been working with the Railroad Commission as well as the landowners over the last several months," spokesman Matt Pitzarella said. "We believe that the methane in the water has absolutely no connection to our operations in the area. We provided that information to the Railroad Commission, the landowners and to the EPA." The Railroad Commission issued a statement saying members of its staff also have not reached conclusions about the source of the contamination. It said Range Resources is cooperating with the commission's investigation and already had agreed last week to conduct more tests, as well as to perform soil gas surveys, monitor gas concentrations, and offer a water supply to affected residents.

 

"If the data indicates oil field activities are responsible for the gas found in the water well, the (commission) will require assessment, cleanup, and evaluate what fines or penalties may be
assessed as necessary," the statement said. But John Blevins, the director of the EPA's compliance assurance and enforcement division, wrote in a letter Tuesday to Range Resources that the contamination findings present "a potential imminent endangerment to the health of persons using those private drinking water wells."

 

The EPA gave Range Resources 24 hours to inform the agency in writing that it will comply with the federal order. It then had 48 hours to provide impacted families with clean drinking water and install
monitors in the homes to ensure methane gas levels don't rise to explosive levels. The company was given five days to begin a thorough survey of the aquifer to determine if other wells and families also could be impacted by contamination.

 

Range Resources has been using new technologies that make it possible to extract once out-of-reach natural gas reserves. Horizontal drilling, along with the hydraulic fracturing, make it possible for drillers to permeate once impenetrable geologic formations called shale. The companies pump high volumes of water and chemicals at great pressure into the well bore to permeate the rock, and
there have been complaints in some places — especially in Pennsylvania — that underground aquifers have been contaminated in the process.

 

This is the first such suspicion in Texas, Armendariz said. The families in Parker County have not been identified, but Armendariz said they had been using the wells for years and never had issues until Range began drilling nearby in April 2009. One of the greatest fears is of explosion, he said.

The EPA issued the emergency order under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Texas Railroad commissioner Michael L. Williams called it "Washington politics of the worst kind."

 

"The EPA's act is nothing more than grandstanding in an effort to interject the federal government into Texas business," he said.

___

Associated Press writer Terry Wallace in Dallas contributed to this report.



Tags: contamination, drilling, epa, texas

Views: 879

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

All parties involved need to co-operate expeditiously to determine and correct the potable water problem in North Texas. The EPA, the TRRC, Range Resources and the affected surface owners need to get to the bottom of this very serious situation.

Although the likelihood of a shale drilling operation to contaminate any fresh water formation thousands of feet above it seems very remote, we must direct the very best expert and technological effort toward determining what the truth is. Should that in depth study find that drilling is the culprit, then the next step is to learn and implement procedures to avoid that contamination...and quickly.

This issue...contamination of drinking water.. has the potential to destroy the US' natural gas potential or at least put a serious dent in that potential. US natural gas reserves are a potential game changer in the nation's immediate energy needs. If it results in drinking water contamination the game is over or very seriously affected.

Saying this is serious is a vast understatement. We have seen the environmental disaster that the Deepwater Horizon caused this summer and this could be simarly disastrous. Idiotic commentary by the TRRC's Michael Williams simply adds more fuel to this fire.
Alamo,

"Although the likelihood of a shale drilling operation to contaminate any fresh water formation thousands of feet above it seems very remote..."

The wellbore has to pass through the aquifer to get to the shale formation. If the wellbore has a leak at the aquifer level then the water is contaminated. Did you not read or understand dbob's post a few post back?
I happen to live on the NY, PA border and one of the big problems is that many water wells already contain methane and sulfur and have for many generations, gas drilling has had nothing to do with it. Many gascos came here and failed to test the water wells prior to drilling and now face many challenges because of the lack of testing.

The environmental movement in the marcellus is more of a NIMBY movement from those that have bought vacation homes in the areas that now have high potential for gas extraction. They have been using misinformation and fear mongering to intimidate those that haven't taken the time to understand the processes. They tend to blurr the lines between fracturing and drilling and like gasland, Josh Fox claims to live in PA when in reality he is a Manhattanite, uses sensationalism and misinformation to steal headlines in the local papers.

If you tell people something long enough they will start to believe you. They are now preparing to make this a national issue so be fore warned and prepared. these forces are coming to Haynesville too.

There are anti drilling forces in NY with deep pockets and big contacts in the information world, ie.. NYT, 60 minutes, Hollywood and especially Pro Publica, supported by the Sandler family and George Soros.
The EPA makes a presumption that anyone who is in business is guilty until the prove themselves innocent. This is anathema to those of us who believe in limited government and states rights. For someone who is not elected by the people, this clown Armendariz has way too much power .
Checks and balances. The EPA can, and often does, serve a useful purpose. I completely agree that when they ignore the fundamental Constitutional principle of separation of powers, they should be jerked back on a very short chain. But I am just as concerned about unchecked business interests as I am about unchecked government. Too much power concentrated in one place is generally not a good thing. I am hoping that we will see a return to reason, EPA fulfilling its mandate, but severely reprimanded for overreaching, and business behaving responsibly toward the citizens of this nation.
I think they should be looking at all of the old existing well bores drilled decades ago by wild cat prospectors. These old bores are located everywhere, never drilled to todays specifications, rarely if ever pluged and abandoned properly. The fracking cold be extending into some of these old well bores and then leaking into the water table through the old casing or well bore of the old well.

Are you the Grinch who stole Christmas?  I could have sailed trough the holidays without thinking of contamination of the OLD wells.  I remember many that were old when I was a boy.

 

The bottom line is that we have to minimize risks to water any way we can. We can't clean it up again (can we in the aquafier?)

 

 

 

 

 

Good point Charles but if Range is the nearest current operator they need to stop the denial routine and just get busy and fix the problem. 

All,

 

As a point of reinforcement, this appears to be a casing issue, not specifically a hydraulic fracturing event.  The compunds detected are consistent with natural gas/condensate, and I haven't seen anything that appears to be a frac fluid. 

 

I don't object personnally or professionally with the Epa being involved, but the  use of the sensationaized presss release particularly on a case that isn't yet clear cut.  If you want to pressure Range,  go inspect their drilling operations in several states and shut several of them down. 

 

There is an EPa isotopic fingerprint analysis,which appears to show the gas comes from the same formation tapped by Ranges wells, but we don't know the date of the analyis was made available to range.   The levels of contaminants had never been measured priro to the recent investigation.  No testing was done for BTEX or natural gas at the time the water wells were drilled. There are no old wells in the area, so return up improperly plugged welss is unlikely.  The levels of contaminatns are rleatively lowlow, and do nott appear to be sufficient to actually produce explosive water.  Bezene concentration is below the EPA drinking water MCL in all but one sample.  The sample where benzene is above the MCL was taken by TRRC. 

 

So I don't think RRC is trying to cover it up, Range is probably just keeping with a general theme of corporate deniability until invesitgation is finished. 

the generation of sensational media coverage was the goal, and to be blunt it wouldn't matter whether or not it was directly related to hydraulic fracturing, just being tangentially related to gas production is justification aplenty.

 

i even saw the headline from a dallas paper's web article yesterday (or maybe it was the day before, i can't remember) which flat out said it was hydraulic fracturing that caused the contamination.  most people get their 'news' and develop their 'opinions' from soundbites and headlines, so the damage continues to be inflicted by NIMBY derangement syndrome and so-called environmentalists that think pixie dust and unicorn farts are going to power the economy.

 

facts just doesn't matter to these people, as far as they're concerned the gas industry punches holes in mother earth and pumps chemicals into our water supply with demonic glee, and that's that.

 

i don't necessarily have a problem with the EPA either, what i do have a problem with are the type of people i just described being in charge of it.

Yeah, Enlightening Entertainment ... or is it Entertaining Enlightenment???  Can't remember how it goes ... brain cells fading fast...  Anyway, "boo, hissssss." 

 

80)

what?

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service