I watch Dept. of Conservation, Sonris, online Desoto courthouse records and the Holly Field is without a doubt the busiest of all fields. Also it is the field getting all the gas factories. Encana, Chesapeak, Encana, Exco, and now El Paso are doing the gas factory concept. Is it because it is so good in the field, or because it is close to major pipelines??

Views: 1514

Replies to This Discussion

I believe it to be location, entry cost, ease of working with land owners, fewer land owners per section to deal with, ease of drill, strong production, the potential of the BO and SMK, and a little luck. I don't believe the Holly Field to be the best at any one thing but good at many.

Please keep reporting what you know about this field.

We have land there!

Asking those with Haynesville production in the Holly Field - what have you found the rate of decline to look like? I know it varies from well to well, but generally. 1st 6 months, 6-12, etc. We should have enough production and for long enough to get an idea of the trend.
So after 1 year the production is 22.42 of what it was the first month? 6 month production was 50.81? Average.

*error in my previous excell info post...this is correct info*

Keeping in mind that all wells vary on frac stage numbers, chokes, and operator methodology, the following wells have declined as follows after a full 1st year in 14n 14w:

 

sec 12 - 82.01%

sec 17 - 78.22%

sec 24 - 69.73%

sec 25 - 79.86%

sec 35 - 76.53%

mean = 77.27% which is better than the industry estimated norm of 80-81%

 

After only 6 months as follows:

sec 12 - 30.05%

sec 17 - 43.22%

sec 24 - 54.00%

sec 25 - 30.63%

sec 35 - 40.51%

sec 9 - 47.36%

mean = 40.96%

 

**some wells not included due to their respected "issues" and, or wild fluctuations**

In sec 28 14n14w. Sonris list the Well Allowable as 20,350+. Does this reference the well potential? Only went to sales the end of October, so have not received payment. Also sec 27 14n14w says it's rig was "moved to Pegus 25" in November. At this time only the vertical (10,250') was complete. Why would this have happened? Will they move another rig in to complete the horizontal? Do you suspect a problem?

Kitty Kat Momma, I'm pretty darn sure 14n 14w has the BO.  Off the LDNR website I saw info pertaining to the BO on a 14n 14w well.  Now, I'm no oil/gas pro or geologist but the info appears to me that the BO is there.....although if it is good, bad, productive, etc. I don't know...but I feel good about it.

I know we're close on the maps I've seen on several companies websites. How do you look this up on LDNR's website? Prices just need to bump up to make it worthwhile. Also having the BO would be great.

Parkdota, the attached Petrohawk map shows the Holly Field to be in the productive area of the commercial interval of the Bossier Shale.  Although Petrohawk refers to this interval as the Lower Bossier Shale most operators refer to this as the Mid-Bossier Shale.  

Attachments:

Les, great map...thanks.  I've had my eye on the Holly Field Moran 28 #240665 but haven't been able to make heads or tails of the data via sonris et al.  I've seen where it came in at 11,000 mcf/day (HA play sister site) yet on sonris it has only 4,085 but the map you gave has 13,000+/- and the best full month to sales is 28,590 mcf/day with oil and shows this being in the 5th month which is odd.  To date this is the oddest well I've looked at for data.  Can you give some insight?

Parkdota, I forgot to mention that the infomation does not quite tie because there is no Moran 28 #1 Well.  So I am not sure which well Petrohawk was referencing with the 13.0 MMcfd test rate. 

OK, hate to sound like the dummy, but explain the legends to me:

the red lg. cirle going through the Holly Field. Does that mean that only a part of

of the Holly is productive for the Bossier

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service