Three permits.
243808
243809
243810
You guys who know what you are doing, take a look please.
Tags:
Skip,
Look at the spacing between the bores.
Let's see if this helps.
243808 HA RA SUW;WAITES 4-15-10 H 001-ALT
2051' FEL & 326' FSL OF SEC 4. PBHL: 2310' FEL & 250' FNL OF SEC 4.
243809 HA RA SUW;WAITES 4-15-10 H 002-ALT
2026' FEL & 326' FSL OF SEC 4. PBHL: 1980' FEL & 250' FNL OF SEC 4.
243810 HA RA SUW;WAITES 4-15-10 H 003-ALT
1976' FEL & 326' FSL OF SEC 4. PBHL: 1650' FEL & 250' FNL OF SEC 4.
The original alternate unit well application plat shows the drilled well plus 7 alternate wells.
Can't look back to Jan-Feb to get a link to that one.
A new alternate unit plat (not on the website yet) shows 3 added alternate wells in between
the original alternate wells. I looked at the bottom hole distance from the east line on the drilling permits. They are 330' apart.
Excerpt from Q2 QEP conference call:
Clearly the economics and the performance support a much higher well density, 8 wells per section, or maybe even more and we're just not sure yet on exactly how many wells that is. At some point, those wells do interfere with each other and you do see a deterioration in per well EURs. That's the reason we had not been aggressive about raising the PUD EUR even though if we look at our average PDP well, it's probably greater than 6 Bcf of EUR, the forecasted recoverable reserves to the producing wells, because of the anticipation that ultimately we're going to book this field up on increased density at 8 wells a section or more.
68 members
478 members
194 members
11 members
405 members
18 members
250 members
457 members
11 members
388 members
Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by