Last week I received a letter asking me to sign a PSA for a new horizontal well going into CGU9.  It delineated the "Sharing Area" as being a rectangle 330 feet on either side of the lateral line of the well (width = 660 feet) and the length of the rectangle being the lateral line + 330 feet on either end.  Hence, a 4,500 horizontal well would have a "Sharing Area" of (660 ft. x 5160 ft.)/43560 sq. ft/acre = 78.18 acres. 

 

I am a very minor owner in the royalty from this area, having inherited the royalty down through several generations (and divisions), but I do have a few questions that maybe someone can answer for me.  They are:

1.  What sets the 330 ft. used in calculating the "Sharing Area"?  Obviously, this is what Anadarko is saying the length a well can pull oil/gas into it's piping, right?  But, clearly it's in the Company's best interest to set this number as low as possible. So, do I have any basis for asking for a higher number?

 

2.  What's the downside of me not signing?  How would this play out?  What would be the financial impact one way of the other?

 

Thanks in advance for any enlightenment on this subject.

Tags: Anadarko, Carthage, Haynesville, Panola

Views: 406

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I got one way back last summer from samson.  I asked on this site about PSA and nobody seemed to know about them.

What they did was combine my 630 acre unit with a 300 acre unit ..IF they had drilled then the paper work said that I would get 60% of any production..the other acres would share in the production.

The agreement was signed but then Samson didn't drill.  I want a well..and felt that PSA would increase chances of getting one.  Didn't pan out for me but hope it does for you.

Being a small holder don't think you can stop the psa really.  What I decided is this: if don't sign the old units are not large enough to warrant drilling...so enlarging the units makes sense in that way.  But yours is talking about feet not acres.  I don't think the 300 feet would mean much in royalty payments.  IF you own the whole 300 feet..that would be interesting.

I meant to post the psa I got for the site..will still do that if I ever get a well.

I know that the well they proposed went right to the edge of the original unit..

Isuppose if you owed most of the unit they wanted to increase with a PSA you could hold out for payment for deep rights...some of the old leases covered all depths but some did not.

But for my situation signing was best thing to do to increase opportunity for drilling on site.

There is a LOT of acreage and units out there they drillers can move to. 

I have heard that some owners are giving the pad sites away ..and right of way ..to get the well drilled.

I didn't have to do that..but then I was disappointed in not getting a well.

The 330 ft distance to the unit line is set by the Texas RRC and is arrived at by dividing the 660 ft minimum spacing between wellheads in half.  It is based on the best science available to the State pertaining to "drainage" of a field, supposedly to minimize or prevent someone from "sucking all the oil/gas out from under my property".  A few years ago the minimum was reduced from 467 ft to 330 ft.  Operators can apply for exceptions to this rule, which is how "stacked laterals" are now allowed in many counties in the Haynesville.

Thanks. Guess it doesn't matter if I sign or not.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service