CHK's Offer To Acquire Additional Interest in Leased Properties

Did anyone receive a letter from Chesapeake with their royalty payments today stating Chesapeake is actively pursuing the acquisition of additional interests in their wells? I don't understand what the offer.

Views: 5165

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

layla, IMO any offer to purchase minerals that does not include a dollar amount is, just as you say, a fishing expedition.  And CHK may or may not be the actual buyer.  The wording, "Ark-La-Tex Basin" is also a red flag.  As much as the letters may be fit only for the trash I"d still like to see a copy.

Skip,

I sent you a friend request.  If you send me a fax number I'll fax you a copy of the letter.  I filled mine out and faxed it to Chesapeake, because I'm curious to see their offer.

I accepted Ronny.  However I haven't faxed anything in 6 years and I'm not set up for it.  Scan to email is so much better for many of the documents I regularly deal with and that do not fax well. 

Will try to scan and post it later tonight. No scanner at work.

That'll be fine.  Thanks.

Thanks, Inquirer.  I suspect that CHK is fronting for one or more mineral/royalty funds for a fee or an interest in any minerals purchased.  At this point I doubt that CHK is investing any cash in purchasing mineral interests.  The list of areas of interest cover most of the historic hydrocarbon producing provinces in the lower 48.

 Thanks, Skip.  Sorry the print is so small when I uploaded it.

Be careful with anything promises or contracts with Chesapeake even when its approved by Aubrey McClendon himself. I have in house emails from CHK from Aubrey, Dave Bolton, Jeff Brooks, and others. These show how they agree to purchase leases then in one state I think we can get the lease we want cheaper if we can identify and buy ourself....they simply were running title so they could default on a legal binding contract. Cheats liars and theives are the best fitting describes them all.

They pay shell companies to tie it up get title information and then default. As in the case when they paid Romac Energy of Longview Texas 5 million dollars to tie it up. Then after Romac defaulted they set up Stoneridge Energy to sell property to avoid the lis pendens filings in the court houses. I have the documents to prove it all. So anything beyond cash from CHK is worthless.

My guess is that Skip's guess is mostly accurate. CHK is using their huge database of owners and making money selling your lease to a fund of some type.

There are MANY funds from investments for large pension funds to publicly traded funds to a wealthy investor group's private monies.

Who besides CHK has the large, big, gigantic databases of lease owners that a fund would want to contact? A database of names and dollar figures would be a gold mine for the right investors.

And, I am not intending to disagree with any of the other posters who advise caution when dealing with CHK or any company. But Skip's idea sounds like the most practical and the only way CHK would be making any money out of it.

Suggestion. When your guess matches Mr. Peel's guess just let it stand. Good for housekeeping, you know.

Did someone die and appoint you head drover, or are you just self-appointed?

 

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service