Oil & Gas Pro

CHESAPEAKE APPLIES TO TAKE OVER HA UNITS FROM XTO

CHK has applied to the Commissioner to replace XTO as operator of the following HA units in the Converse Field:  HA RA SU77 - Section 21 - 9N -13W, HA RA SU83 - Section 15 - 9N -13W and HA RA SU84 - Section 22 - 9N - 13W,

http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch_070611/UCMRedir.aspx?url=ht...

Views: 898

Replies to This Discussion


landownerPermalink Reply by J B Nabors on March 13, 2013 at 6:20
IMO, that is unfortunate.

Chesapeake is my "least favored" operator. They have been to court many many times for actions unfavorable to mineral owners. Examples: for failing to honor a "No Cost" clause in a lease, and for selling production to a subsidiary at below market prices. We have a well that is partly owned by Plains--and Chesapeake consistently pays significantly less per MCF than Plains for the same time period.

RSS

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content 

1 Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map

Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2 More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs

More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3 Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5

Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4 Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5 Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push

Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
6 Request For Assistance

Request For Assistance
7 The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

Groups

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service