Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Snake Stewart on August 10, 2008 at 11:07

Mmmarkkkkkkkk , At 1 1/2 acre where would this 2% come from ?
How long are you guy's going to keep trying to force feed this froced pooled garbage down our necks. Heck , It seems like CHSPK would be a pretty good business partner! They havent drilled a dry hole in God knows how long. 8100 holes on the Barnett and not a dry one yet.They know more now then they did 10 years ago! I promise to quit posting my same old drivel when you quit trying the same old tired not so scary tactics of forced pooling. I believe on a 640 acre section the number would be close to $9260 an acre for a $6,000,000 well. Much lower then that if CHSPK gets their way and we go 1920 acre or larger units. Around $3000 an acre at that rate. I may start funding some wells around here if they would only give me the opportunity to do so! Have a nice afternoon guy's . It looks like the stress of all this opposition from the peasants may be getting to you.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Johnson on August 7, 2008 at 4:29

That's the key to me......with consent the law says you assume the risk. Risk = Lawsuits and Money.

non-consent = no risk other than not getting a signing bonus and 25% royalties while the well pays for it's self.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Grillin' - MmmMmm on August 8, 2008 at 10:26

to be clear, if you are a non-leased land owner you will never get a % royalty. You get your full share. If your land compromises 10% of the unit, you get all 10% of the net proceeds after expenses, transport, etc. If you were a leased land owner, you would get your royalty percentage times the 10%. But still no bonus.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Johnson on August 10, 2008 at 10:51

True....but I was only talking about consent, or non-consent....not being leased.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Aubrey C. Sanders, Jr. on August 7, 2008 at 11:59

Partners refer to other parties who may own leases, but not land, within the proposed drilling unit. Individual landowners are not partners in the prospect, unless they sign consent to AFE. Unless there have been very recent changes in State Statuates the landowner can only be held responsible for his actual proportionate share of drilling costs and operator can only collect that from revenue derived from well. If landowner does not sign consent he has no obligation to pay except from well revenue realized. Partners in the deal will pay penalty based upon Joint Operating Agreement between partnes. I have seen as much as 300% penalty.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Randy on August 7, 2008 at 14:10

I think it is worded that any tract that has co-owners are subject to the 200% penalty.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jack B2 on August 7, 2008 at 14:32

Thanks Mr. Sanders, well stated.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Snake Stewart on August 10, 2008 at 11:10

Well said Mr. Sanders

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kassi on August 7, 2008 at 14:45

§10. Agreements for drilling units; pooling interests; terms and conditions; expenses

A. When two or more separately owned tracts of land are embraced within a drilling unit which has been established by the commissioner as provided in R.S. 30:9(B), the owners may validly agree to pool their interests and to develop their lands as a drilling unit.

(1) Where the owners have not agreed to pool their interests, the commissioner shall require them to do so and to develop their lands as a drilling unit, if he finds it to be necessary to prevent waste or to avoid drilling unnecessary wells.

(a) All orders requiring pooling shall be made after notice and hearing. They shall be upon terms and conditions that are just and reasonable and that will afford the owner of each tract the opportunity to recover or receive his just and equitable share of the oil and gas in the pool without unnecessary expense. They shall prevent or minimize reasonable avoidable drainage from each developed tract which is not equallized by counter drainage.

(b) The portion of the production allocated to the owner of each tract included in a drilling unit formed by a pooling order shall, when produced be considered as if it had been produced from his tract by a well drilled thereon.

(c) Repealed by Acts 1984, No. 345, §2, eff. Jan. 1, 1985.

(2) In the event pooling is required, the cost of development and operation of the pooled unit chargeable to the owners therein shall be determined and recovered as provided herein.

(a)(i) Any owner drilling or intending to drill a unit well, including a substitute unit well, on any drilling unit heretofore or hereafter created by the commissioner, may, by certified mail, return receipt requested, notify all other owners in the unit of the drilling or the intent to drill and give each owner an opportunity to elect to participate in the risk and expense of such well. Such notice shall contain:

(aa) An estimate of the cost of drilling, testing, completing, and equipping the unit well;

(bb) The proposed location of the unit well;

(cc) The proposed objective depth of the unit well; and

(dd) All logs, core analysis, production data, and well test data from the unit well which has not been made public.

(ii) Such election to participate must be exercised by mailing written notice thereof by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the owner drilling or intending to drill the unit well within thirty days after receipt of the initial notice. Failure to give timely written notice of the election to participate shall be deemed to be an election not to participate.

(iii) Another initial notice must be sent in order for the provisions of this Subsection to apply if the drilling of the proposed unit well is not commenced in accordance with the initial notice within ninety days after receipt of the initial notice.

(b)(i) Should a notified owner elect not to participate in the risk and expense of the unit well or should such owner elect to participate in the risk and expense of the unit well and then fail to pay his share of such expenses within sixty days of receipt of detailed invoices, the owner drilling same shall, in addition to any other available legal remedies to enforce collection of such expenses, be entitled to own and recover out of production from such unit well allocable to the tract belonging to the nonparticipating owner such tract's allocated share of the actual reasonable expenditures incurred in drilling, testing, completing, equipping, and operating the unit well, including a charge for supervision, together with a risk charge, which risk charge shall be one hundred percent of such tract's allocated share of the cost of drilling, testing, and completing the unit well.

(ii) Any owner not notified shall bear only his tract's allocated share of the actual reasonable expenditures incurred in drilling, testing, completing, equipping, and operating the unit well, including a charge for supervision, which share shall be subject to the same obligation and remedies and rights to own and recover out of production in favor of the drilling party or parties as hereinabove provided.

(c) Should a drilling unit be created by order of the commissioner around a well already drilled or drilling and including one or more tracts as to which the owner or owners thereof had not participated in the risk and expense of drilling such well, the provisions hereinabove for notice, election, and participation shall be applicable as if a unit well were being proposed by the owner who drilled or was drilling such well; however, the cost of drilling, testing, completing, equipping, and operating the well allocable to each tract included in the unit shall be reduced in the same proportion as the recoverable reserves in the unitized pool have been recovered by prior production, if any, in which said tract or tracts did not participate prior to determining the share of cost allocable to such tract or tracts.

(d)(i) Should a drilling unit be revised by order of the commissioner so as to include an additional tract or tracts, the provisions hereinabove for notice, election, and participation shall be applicable to such added tract or tracts and the owner thereof as if a unit well were being proposed by the owner who had drilled the unit well; however, the cost of drilling, testing, completing, equipping, and operating the unit well shall be reduced in the same proportion as the recoverable reserves in the unitized pool have been recovered by prior production, if any, in which said tract or tracts did not participate prior to determining the share of cost allocable to the subsequently included tract or tracts.

(ii) Should a drilling unit be revised by order of the commissioner as to exclude a tract or tracts, the cost of drilling, testing, completing, equipping, and operating the unit well shall be reduced in the same proportion as the recoverable reserves in the unitized pool have been recovered by prior production to determine the share of cost allocable to the subsequently excluded tract or tracts.

(e) The provisions of Paragraph 2(b) above with respect to the risk charge shall not apply to any unleased interest not subject to an oil, gas, and mineral lease. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 2(b) the royalty owner and overriding royalty owner shall receive that portion of production due to them under the terms of the contract creating the royalty.

(f) In the event of a dispute relative to the calculation of unit well costs or depreciated unit well costs, the commissioner shall determine the proper costs after notice to all interested owners and a public hearing thereon.

(g) Nothing contained herein shall have the effect of enlarging, displacing, varying, altering, or in any way whatsoever modifying or changing the rights and obligations of the parties thereto under any contract between or among owners having a tract or tracts in the unit.

(h) The owners in the unit to whom the notice provided for hereinabove may be sent, are the owners of record as of the date on which the notice is sent.

(3) If there is included in any unit created by the commissioner of conservation one or more unleased interests for which the party or parties entitled to market production therefrom have not made arrangements to separately dispose of the share of such production attributable to such tract, and the unit operator proceeds with the sale of unit production, then the unit operator shall pay to such party or parties such tract's pro rata share of the proceeds of the sale of production within one hundred eighty days of such sale.

B. Should the owners of separate tracts embraced within a drilling unit fail to agree upon the pooling of the tracts and the drilling of a well on the unit, and should it be established by final and unappealable judgment of court that the commissioner is without authority to require pooling as provided for in Subsection A, then, subject to all other applicable provisions of this Chapter, the owner of each tract embraced within the drilling unit may drill thereon. The allowable production therefrom shall be such proportion of the allowable for the full unit as the area of the separately owned tract bears to the full drilling unit.

Acts 1984, No. 345, §1 and §2, eff. Jan. 1, 1985; Acts 1991, No. 595, §1.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kassi on August 7, 2008 at 14:47

Please note, Revised Statute 30, Section 10 (2)(e) clearly states the 200% penalty does NOT apply to land owners.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by alleyboy on August 8, 2008 at 3:56

if they drill a well in my unit which I have received a lease payment and the well goes into production, how long will it be before they start paying me royalties. Will they have to recover all their costs first.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kassi on August 8, 2008 at 11:30

If you are a leased land owner then you should begin to receive royalty checks within the time frame outlined in your lease (typically 90 - 120 days). An unsigned lease holder must wait until the well pays for itself and then has to pretty much bird dog the O&G company to ensure he gets paid after expenses are paid.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page