Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on September 14, 2009 at 15:28

4HTSG, the short answer is yes it typical for mineral owners in adjacent sections to receive notification.

Can you post additional information reagarding the proposed units (ie the unit names)?

Permalink Reply by 4HTSG on September 14, 2009 at 15:42

CV & HA RA SUA

CV & HA RA SUB

CV & HA RA SUC

CV & HA RA SUD

CV & HA RA SUE

I hope this is the info you needed.

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on September 15, 2009 at 3:24

Thanks 4HTSG!! I assume the following:

CV & HA RA SUA - Section 19
CV & HA RA SUB - Section 20
CV & HA RA SUC - Section 21
CV & HA RA SUD - Section 28
CV & HA RA SUE - Section 29

Permalink Reply by 4HTSG on September 15, 2009 at 3:58

That is a correct assumption.

Permalink Reply by Henry on September 15, 2009 at 5:02

Les, Is the Haynesville shale really this far south????

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on September 15, 2009 at 5:50

Henry, it appears at least EnCana believes the Haynesville Shale is there. Although there a little dated, see the attached blob maps.

Attachments:

• Blob Maps 4-21-09.pdf, 254 KB

Permalink Reply by Henry on September 15, 2009 at 9:12

Les, I guess time, and a few wells, will tell. Thanks.