Driller denies that it contaminated Texas aquifer - EPA Makes Aggressive Move

Posted as an FYI:

Driller denies that it contaminated Texas aquifer


By RAMIT PLUSHNICK-MASTI Associated Press © 2010 The Associated Press

Dec. 7, 2010, 8:44PM

HOUSTON — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued an emergency order against a Texas gas driller Tuesday, accusing the company of contaminating an aquifer and giving it 48 hours to provide clean drinking water to affected residents and begin taking steps to resolve the problem.
 

The order is unprecedented in Texas, partly because the federal body overstepped the state agency responsible for overseeing gas and oil drilling in the state. The EPA's move could ratchet up a bitter fight between Texas and the EPA that has evolved in the past year from a dispute over environmental issues into a pitched battle over states rights.

 

EPA regional director Al Armendariz said he issued the order against Range Resources of Fort Worth, Texas, because he felt the Texas Railroad Commission was not responding quickly enough to contamination found in two water wells belonging to Parker County residents in North Texas.

The EPA began inspecting the wells in August after receiving complaints from residents who said the Texas commission and Range Resources had not responded to problems they were having with their drinking water. The EPA inspected the wells with the commission, Armendariz said, and found high levels of explosive methane, as well as other contaminants, including cancer-causing benzene.

"We thought what we found in the homes was alarming," Armendariz told The Associated Press.

Range Resources on Tuesday denied being the source of the contamination.

 

"We've been working with the Railroad Commission as well as the landowners over the last several months," spokesman Matt Pitzarella said. "We believe that the methane in the water has absolutely no connection to our operations in the area. We provided that information to the Railroad Commission, the landowners and to the EPA." The Railroad Commission issued a statement saying members of its staff also have not reached conclusions about the source of the contamination. It said Range Resources is cooperating with the commission's investigation and already had agreed last week to conduct more tests, as well as to perform soil gas surveys, monitor gas concentrations, and offer a water supply to affected residents.

 

"If the data indicates oil field activities are responsible for the gas found in the water well, the (commission) will require assessment, cleanup, and evaluate what fines or penalties may be
assessed as necessary," the statement said. But John Blevins, the director of the EPA's compliance assurance and enforcement division, wrote in a letter Tuesday to Range Resources that the contamination findings present "a potential imminent endangerment to the health of persons using those private drinking water wells."

 

The EPA gave Range Resources 24 hours to inform the agency in writing that it will comply with the federal order. It then had 48 hours to provide impacted families with clean drinking water and install
monitors in the homes to ensure methane gas levels don't rise to explosive levels. The company was given five days to begin a thorough survey of the aquifer to determine if other wells and families also could be impacted by contamination.

 

Range Resources has been using new technologies that make it possible to extract once out-of-reach natural gas reserves. Horizontal drilling, along with the hydraulic fracturing, make it possible for drillers to permeate once impenetrable geologic formations called shale. The companies pump high volumes of water and chemicals at great pressure into the well bore to permeate the rock, and
there have been complaints in some places — especially in Pennsylvania — that underground aquifers have been contaminated in the process.

 

This is the first such suspicion in Texas, Armendariz said. The families in Parker County have not been identified, but Armendariz said they had been using the wells for years and never had issues until Range began drilling nearby in April 2009. One of the greatest fears is of explosion, he said.

The EPA issued the emergency order under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Texas Railroad commissioner Michael L. Williams called it "Washington politics of the worst kind."

 

"The EPA's act is nothing more than grandstanding in an effort to interject the federal government into Texas business," he said.

___

Associated Press writer Terry Wallace in Dallas contributed to this report.



Tags: contamination, drilling, epa, texas

Views: 851

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I don't believe Arkansas is any better then Texas, there was a 'hot spill' during fracking on my property. This was told to us by the people cleaning up the mess. The company themselves - deny, deny, and deny let them prove us it happened. But they took three feet of soil and top soil in the area this happened. ADEQ inspector was called and came over to inspect. "I don't see nothing..." I have pictures of the spill and them cleaning it up. This said ADEQ inspector now works for the gas company. Thank God for the EPA now doing something for those in Texas. Money goes along way to clean things in the O and G industries!!!

FX - Not sure I understand.  Are you saying that benzene is a naturally occuring produced hydrocarbon?

 

Anyway, here's an MSDS sheet for used frac fluids from Gibson Energy.  I see a lot of warnings here.  Perhaps you could give an assist and explain how these warnings are not applicable to what MIGHT escape into water wells due to faulty casing?

 

thanks,  80)

Attachments:
sesport,

bezene,toluene,xyxlenes, and other similar hydrocarbons can be quiet abundant in natural gas, particularly in condensate rich gas. it is wide spread, naturally occuring and a relatively large industrial hygiene issue for those in direct contact.

sesport,

 

Benzene can be part of naturally occuring produced hydrocarbons.

 

Please refer to the CDC fact sheet on benzene.

 

If you are doubting the possibility of casing problems, please read dbob's post in this thread.

FX - No, not doubting the casing problem.  We had a similar incident here recently.

 

So, these hydrocarbons, including benzene, are naturally occuring but are "produced."  Any idea what MAY have caused them to be "produced?"

 

thanks again, and to dbob, too, for the thoughts  80)

COME ON PEOPLE.I know the site is pro natural gas ,but personal observations and reading and hearing statements of many others tells me all drillers and frackers dont have proper controls.I have interest also, but Texas was dragging tail in response to this.The right thing to do was help these people and force an immediate cleanup and examination of the situation.If we want fracking to continue,it must follow tight proper procedures.
Accidents happen and the responsible party should be held to do everything they can to remedy the situation in this case. These companies don't go around poisoning wells on purpose. I think that the State was getting all the facts in order to act appropriately when in swoops the feds who turn it into a media opportunity.
Could you imagine what a "cluster" it would be for the companies doing things the right way to deal with the States and the EPA on every well drilled on land in the US. It would be like having one Dept. of Motor Vehicles office for the entire country.
Yes. What I noted was drilling commenced April 2009. The date of first complaint was not noted, but if these people have been trying to get a drinking water problem resolved for over a year with no action, then I have to question if the driller is being "a bit unresponsive", in which case I actually understand the EPA stepping in. The best way to keep EPA off of your back is to be reasonably responsive. I think a fair assessment on all this would involve not only finding the cause and extent of contamination, but the timelines. I have lived on places with my own well several times, and messing up somebody's primary source of water is no laughing matter; I am sure lots of folks in the country on this website understand that...
I agree Robert Duke, has anyone ever seen Erin Brockovich? Granted, it has NOTHING to do with O&G, but has EVERYTHING to do with big company vs regular folk and their drinking water. The town of Hinkley literally DIED (along with a FEW people). Just sayin'.....

despite how irritated i was by the implication that one should get their opinions about serious stuff from hollywood movies, i let it go.  but given the three studies that have come to light, i feel as though i should bump this.

"Erin Brockovich" Town Shows No Cancer Cluster

http://reason.com/blog/2010/12/13/erin-brockovich-town-shows-no

 

mhmm

Wow, interesting development.  I still believe in checks in balances, and that neither industry nor government always does the right thing.  I hope for a time when EPA engages more in responsible science and less in politics, but realize the naivette in that.

 

I DO believe that there are instances where industry has done things that clearly have a negative impact on people - Love Canal as well as the tobacco industry come immediately to mind;  DDT was clearly driving some raptors toward extinction (I think I have read somewhere a counteranalysis of the increase in human deaths due to malaria).  The quality of every particular example has probably been argued back-and-forth on the internet, with neither side really listening to the other.  The basic reality of contamination problems or harmful products remains.  I really cringe to think of a world of ethylene glycol in toothpaste, fake pharmaceuticals, melamine in milk - all brought to you, courtesy of China, a "minimize your costs at any cost" business climate, and inadequate regulation (the Chinese did ultimately "regulate" the milk contamination guys I believe; I don't know if they made the managers buy their bullet or not).

 

As far as lawyers and class action suits go, the lawyers quite frequently are looking for fame or fortune, or both.  As far as Hollywood goes, I tend to agree, their goal is making money by making entertainment;  Erin Brockovich was a story that would sell.  I would be interested in more references on this, but can also do my own searching.

 

I have over the years realized that true objectivity is unobtainable - (almost) everyone has some sort of agenda that at the very least colors their view of reality.  I am presuming that their still is some kernel of truth in the chromium contamination making some folks patently ill, and the possibility that Brockovich's reaction was at some level an honest one, but who the heck really knows.

silent spring killed tens of millions in africa.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service