Just found this permit application for Lacour 43.

 

 PUBLIC NOTICE - - - In accordance with the laws of the State of Louisiana and the particular reference to the provisions of LA R. S. 30:4, and the provisions of Statewide Order No. 29-B as amended and adopted by the Office of Conservation of the State of Louisiana Anadarko E&P Company LP P. O. Box 1330 Houston, Texas 77251 832-636-3315 is applying to the Injection and Mining Division of the Office of Conservation for a permit to dispose of producing fluids generated from oil and gas production by means of an injection well, which is identified as Lacour 43 SWD Well No. 1, Serial Number (NA), with the injection interval at an approximate depth of 3365 ft. to 4395 ft. The well location is Section 43, Township 3S, Range 8E, Lacour Field, Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana. All interested parties are hereby given an opportunity to submit written comments no later than fifteen (15) days from the date of this publication. Identify the well when corresponding. Direct comments to: Office of Conservation Injection & Mining Division P. O. Box 94275 Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9275 Re: Comments for SWD Application 4513457-aug 9-1t - PUBLIC NOTICES/CONSERVATION

 

Views: 11703

Replies to This Discussion

Heard that the well production has fallen off and they are going to try artificial lift on all three Anadarko wells in the area.  The rig they were using in Avoyelles and Point Coupee has moved to East Texas.

that isn't good.

http://avoyellestoday.com/view/full_story/17269913/article-Rabalais...?

Is the use of artificial lift a bad sign for these wells?

optimistic,

No, its not good. Bringing shale drilling techniques into the Austin Chalk was never a good idea. That's what I've said from the beginning. The AC is difficult to drill and produce. You can't drill laterals over 5000 ft and not plug the formation with mud. You can't produce a well at 3000 bbls per day and not collapse the formation unless you sand/gravel pack it. This is what I've said all along and now they have killed the AC in this area and are moving on to other prospects else where. This is exactly what I was afraid of from the beginning.

Joe,

Is the problem technical or simply economic?  In other words, why would APC make these mistakes 20 years after UPRC and others came to the area, especially after APC aquired UPRC and their data?  There are all types of "intelligence" about this well, from very + to highly -, but I would think that misinformation is part of the mix.  Time will tell.

littleasy,

I think its both. If you look at the history of acquisitions, the acquiring group purges the acquired company of personnel. So I would think that the management of APC purged the people and technology at UPR. Then they had the idea that they could bring shale drilling technology to the AC and all would be fine. That won't work. The two formations are completely different. In the case of a sand or shale formation you have a matrix that allows you to build a "wall cake" as you drill and the mud does not infiltrate the formation. In the case of Chalk with natural fractures you have a formation that has fractures with voids filled with oil, gas and salt water. The more mud you pump while drilling the more will infiltrate the formation. Once the the mud is in the formation it starts to set up. You now have a formation that is "mud logged" and unless you have a way to get the mud out quickly there will be no way to clear it. This again has been my concern from the beginning. You have a bunch of "hot dog" Texans that come in here and ruin the area and the formation for future development. That's my opinion. Also, I stated some time ago that you can not pull AC at 3000 bbls a day unless you gravel/sand pack it. AC is "mobile". Its not fixed and will move and collapse on the well bore at those rates. I blame the Dept. of Natural Resources for allowing companies to produce these wells at rates higher than 1200 bbls per day with out gravel/sand packing them. I'm GLAD that APC does not have my lease and won't be drilling on my property.

APC Joe?

 

 

APC is Anadarko Petroliem Corp.  UPC was Union Pacific Railroad out of Fort Worth and they were absorbed by Anadarko years ago.  They evidently kept some of the records as they went about leasing in Pointe Coupee from the same land owners.  So basically, we have been leased four times by the same people, just the names changed.  As of yet, they have not drilled so I am thinking they know something we do not about the lay of the land below the surface.

William,

You are close. But UPR is actually Union Pacific Resources. Union Pacific Railroad started UPR because of all the land they owned under and along the tracks headed West. It was then sold to Anadarko in the past 3 or 4 years.

Joe,
Maybe they will learn from this and the geologic engineers will workout the optimum conditions to drill and produce the CENLA AC.

Captain, what three wells are you referring to?

Dominque, LaCour, Rabalais.  The formation appears to be full of oil.  Just not enough pressure to get it to the surface.  I do not think Anadarko is done with the area, but I do think they are done in the immediate future.  I think they are going to go back to the drawing board and maybe try another technique.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service