Add a Comment

Comment by Rock Man on June 25, 2020 at 16:57

What we don't know (and never will know) are the details of the monthly production over time. Water rates, choke sizes, etc. Believe me, if the rates were such on this well that it was still economic, the well would not be shut in.

The IP rate works out to a 5.9% oil cut (210 BO & 3343 BW). If the same oil to water ratio was maintained, the 1000 BOPD rate would equate to almost 17,000 BW per day. The unknown facts are the key to understanding what is doing on here.

Comment by Skip Peel - Independent Landman on June 25, 2020 at 15:11

Allowables, as far as I know, are based on state flow tests.  There is no DT-1 test entered in the SONRIS Well File so I think that test would look much like the IP data:

COMPLETED 1/21/2020 AS AN OIL WELL W/ 210 BOPD; 1650 MCFD; 8200 FTP; 6063 SITP; 1300 CP; 18/64" CK; 3343 BWPD; 94% BS&W; 7857; GVTY 52 API; PERF: 16,157'-22,372'

Without a DT-1 date it is impossible to know how soon the test was done after the well was allowed to flow into a sales line.  So did oil and gas flow improve because the well "cleaned up" over time?  The lateral is 6215 linear feet.

Comment by Rock Man on June 25, 2020 at 12:20

Remember how high the initial water rate was on this well (10,000 bpd?). That info is not posted with monthly production. And I think the recent allowable posting is just the regular posting that state puts out regardless of well status. Skip may know more about that process.

Comment by David Crockett on June 25, 2020 at 12:02

I also saw on this well that they have posted an allowable and an estimated potential for July. Does that mean they have opened the well back up. There weren’t any allowable posted since March until the one for July. 

Comment by Skip Peel - Independent Landman on June 25, 2020 at 10:54

Looks correct, hope it is at 1000 barrels a day for February ( a 28 day period).  If the reported volume is correct, it makes the recent work order on the LM 3H seem a little puzzling.

WORK PERMITS

REFERENCE NUMBER	APPLICATION DATE	EXPIRATION DATE	WORK PERMIT TYPE	WORK PERMIT STATUS	WORK PERMIT STATUS_DATE	TOTAL DEPTH	WORK_PERFORMED	DOCUMENTATION RECEIPT DATE	TEST SAND	WORK DESCRIPTION
20-034	03/10/2020	03/10/2021	PLUG AND ABANDON	VERBAL	03/11/2020	0	N		TEMPORARILY ABANDON	TA WELL. SET EZSV @ 14,242'. SQZ 86.4 BBLS BLW EZSV & LEAVE 3.6 BBLS ON TOP. SET BP @ 5300' & LEAVE 200' CMT ON TOP. SET BP @ 500' & SET 100' CMT ON TOP. N/D BOP & LEAVE WH IN PLACE.

Comment by Hydrocarbonite on June 25, 2020 at 10:44

just reviewed production numbers on Crowell #2 on Sonris.  are those real?

02/01/2020

oil 28025

gas 202968

Comment by Hydrocarbonite on June 25, 2020 at 10:37

RPT DATE LUW CODE STORAGE FAC DOC USE WELL CNT OPENING STK OIL PROD(BBL) GAS PROD(MCF) DISPOSITION CLOSING STK PARISH
02/01/2020 052211 1 1530 28025 202968 27795 1760 RAPIDES
01/01/2020 052211 1 0 6011 47298 4481 1530 RAPIDES
CASING

Comment by Rock Man on June 1, 2020 at 15:58

By "cooler" I wonder if this was a surface unit to remove NGL's from gas stream via refrigeration approach (e.g. JT Unit). Having only 5 bbls (slightly over 200 gallons) of "spill" not a big deal based on my oilfield experiences. To temporarily abandon the wellbore because of this doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I may be missing something.

Comment by David Crockett on June 1, 2020 at 15:51

I see that on the crowell lm 30H Number 2 the cooler erupted at the well site during maintennce operations and discharged what appears to be less than 5 bbls of e&p waste (mist of crude oil and sw) to a wooded area behind the location.

so they had a verbal agreement to temporarily abandon the well set CIBP @ 14,800 feet dump 20-30' cmt on top run tubing hanger with 2 way check valve in wellbore close in manual and hydraulic 5 1/8" valves above wellhead  monitor well pressure

probably no big deal, but i don't know

Comment by David Crockett on February 9, 2020 at 14:00

Thanks RM. will be interesting to find out

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 23
• Next ›
• Page