OIL & GAS

LOCATIONS

CADDO PARISH

Hale Oil Co, Hoss Kendrick, 62, Sec. 24, T22N, R15W, Caddo Pine Island, 1200’ MD, Nacatoch.

Hale Oil Co, Hoss Kendrick, 63, Sec. 24, T22N, R15W, Caddo Pine Island, 1200’ MD, Nacatoch.

Hale Oil Co, Hoss Kendrick, 64, Sec. 24, T22N, R15W, Caddo Pine Island, 1200’ MD, Nacatoch.

Kelly Bayou Production, Kendrick Hardeman, 30, Sec. 24, T22N, R15W, Caddo Pine Island, 1200’ MD, Nacatoch.

Kelly Bayou Production, Midyett, 63, Sec. 24, T22N, R15W, Caddo Pine Island, 1200’ MD, Nacatoch.

Kelly Bayou Production, Midyett, 64, Sec. 24, T22N, R15W, Caddo Pine Island, 1200’ MD, Nacatoch.

WEBSTER PARISH

Mid-South Trading Inc, B W slack, 003, Sec. 28, T23N, R9W, Shongaloo, 2990’ MD, Buckrange.

Mid-South Trading Inc, Winkler et al, 005, Sec. 28, T23N, R9W, Shongaloo, 2990’ MD, Buckrange.

COMPLETIONS

DESOTO PARISH

COMPANY: Comstock Oil & Gas LA LLC, HA RA SUE; HOLMES 29-20HC, 1-ALT: 249563. WHERE: Belle Bower, S 29. T. 13N R. 16W. DAILY PRODUCTION: 24300 mcf gas on 30/64 choke; 0 barrels n/a gravity condensate; 1060 barrels water. PRESSURE: 6863 lbs. SPECIFICS: Haynesville RA perforations, 12018-19469 feet, depth, 11473 feet.

RED RIVER PARISH

COMPANY: Vine Oil & Gas LP, HA RD SUG; GEORGE LORMAND 32H, 001-ALT: 249500. WHERE: Red River Bull Bayou, S 05. T. 13N R. 11W. DAILY PRODUCTION: 15100 mcf gas on 30/64 choke; 0 barrels n/a gravity condensate; 249 barrels water. PRESSURE: 7900 lbs. SPECIFICS: Haynesville RD perforations, 12776-17339 feet, depth, 12433 feet.

COMPANY: Vine Oil & Gas LP, HA RD SUG; GEORGE LORMAND 32H, 002-ALT: 249501. WHERE: Red River Bull Bayou, S 05. T. 13N R. 11W. DAILY PRODUCTION: 15100 mcf gas on 30/64 choke; 0 barrels n/a gravity condensate; 505 barrels water. PRESSURE: 7525 lbs. SPECIFICS: Haynesville RD perforations, 12696-17291 feet, depth, 12413 feet.

Views: 831

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Question:  Based on the IP data above, between the Comstock Holmes 29-20HC and the Vine G Lormand 32H #1, which is the more productive well?

Nope, no a trick question.  A question meant to get mineral lessors to think about how well designs are changing.

Choke is the same, lateral length is different, and we don't know the length of time allowed for "clean-up" for the IP.  

If I needed money now, I think I'd rather have the 2 vine wells, in a presumably smaller unit.

Thanks, dbob.  Yeah that's where I was headed in general.  As laterals get longer horizontal drillers are beginning to publish production by 1000' of lateral.  The Comstock Holmes would be 3,261 mcf/lin. ft. and the Vine Lormand would be 3,309 mcf/lin. ft.  Being on the same choke as you point out the wells are very similar in that respect.  The Vine well has 7900# of pressure while the Comstock has 6863#.  Although the report does not tell us which pressure reading I think we can assume for this example that it is the same for both wells.  So the Vine well has 15% higher pressure which generally indicates a longer life and greater EUR if choke settings are the same over time.

Yes, from a royalty owners prospective the Vine would be preferable for the above reasons plus the fact that 100% of the production is allocated to one unit and not shared between multiple units.

The important metric for the operator would be more along the lines of cost per mcf produced so the missing metric is well cost.  In general one of the advantages of longer laterals appears to be lower cost per mcf. 

thanks as well.  i learn new things or perspectives here still, even if activity isn't as high as it once was

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service