Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by G. Rankin Schurman, II on October 26, 2021 at 4:33

FYI - I was advised over the weekend that Headington Energy Partners LLC was mailing out division orders on the unit to the east (Section 13, T12N, R13W) covering the NP LLC 13-12-13 H-1; HA RA SUEE unit still shown as operated by CHK.  I wasn't aware that Headington was active/involved with the Haynesville play - perhaps just an administrative role??    

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on October 26, 2021 at 4:56

Headington is not recognized as an "operator" by the state and is not registered with the SOS.  It looks like they are working interests in some Chesapeake operated units from old assignments.  Cut-and-paste from the DeSoto public records.

11/03/2009	ASSIGNMENT OF OIL AND GAS LEASE	HEADINGTON ROYALTY INC	CHESAPEAKE LOUISIANA LP	Section:23 Township:12 Range:13 TR SEE ORIGINAL
12/13/2011	SUBLEASE OF OIL, GAS AND MIN LEASE	HEADINGTON ROYALTY INC	CHESAPEAKE LOUISIANA LP CHESAPEAKE OPERATING INC	TR SEE ORIGINAL
03/14/2012	SUBLEASE OF OIL, GAS AND MIN LEASE	HEADINGTON ROYALTY INC	CHESAPEAKE LOUISIANA LP CHESAPEAKE OPERATING INC	TR SEE ORIGINAL

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SL on December 10, 2021 at 3:10

Skip, have you heard any "rumblings" on the 3 wells at 23-12-13?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 10, 2021 at 3:17

Nope, no rumblings.  I hope that's a good thing.  Rumbles can be bad.  It appears that the completion operations finished two to three weeks ago.  I wouldn't expect to see the Initial Production data for a couple of months at least.  There is nothing in the database that indicates when the frac plugs are drilled out and the well is "turned to sales".  Once that happens, the operator will run the SDM2G test and prepare the completion report.  The state will review the report and then enter the data in SONRIS.  It can be four to six months after completion before the first royalty from the new wells hits mail boxes.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SL on December 10, 2021 at 3:32

Thanks Skip!  Let's hope for no rumblings. LOL.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 10, 2021 at 3:39

Got my fingers crossed.  ;-)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SL on December 27, 2021 at 16:33

Received division orders today! Hoping we will see something before too long. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 28, 2021 at 6:22

Not long now.  I hope you get good wells.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve P on January 5, 2022 at 5:29

Completion data posted for the three new wells.  They seem very good to me.

Porter 001:  COMPLETED 11/23/21; GAS; 30500 MCFD; 1260# FP; 8258# CP; PERFS 12364-22686'

Porter 002:  Completed 11/23/2021;  Gas' 30600 MCFD; 1260#CP; Perfs 12269-22158'

Porter 003:  COMPLETED 11/23/21; GAS; 24570 MCFD; 1260# FP; 8169# CP; PERFS 12259-22137'

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on January 5, 2022 at 5:36

Yes, they do look good however you have omitted one important data point to evaluating the wells - the choke setting.  The choke orifice gives context to the CP/FP and the reported initial 24 hour volume.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve P on January 5, 2022 at 5:48

I did a cut and paste of what's there.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on January 5, 2022 at 5:54

Yes, the choke settings were omitted on the three wells.  That's the first time that I've seen that.  When the SDM2G test is entered in the well file in the near future, the choke setting will be included.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page