Not complaining, but any idea why my check is so much more for this particular well this month? I went on Sonris, but I am not sure where to look. It is a significant difference, and I was just curious why.
Tags:
I suspect that the reason is related to these three new wells which were recently turned to sales in late November. Congratulations.
HA RA SUEE;ROLLERT 23-12-13 H |
001 |
||||
HA RA SUEE;PORTER23&14-12-13HC |
001-ALT |
||||
HA RA SUEE;PORTER23&14-12-13HC |
002-ALT |
||||
HA RA SUEE;PORTER23&14-12-13HC |
003-ALT |
But, why would the production $ go up for Roller?
Forget the well names. Wells are named for the surface owner of the well site. Look instead at the unit designation, HA RA SUEE. Rollert is the original unit well and the three Porter wells are alternate unit wells. In this case the first unit that the perforated lateral penetrates is Section 23 so although there are two units, SUEE is listed for the well names. A mineral lessor in Section 23 would only receive royalty on production from the linear feet of lateral in that section for the three new wells, not that in Section 14.
307 members
286 members
6 members
49 members
409 members
691 members
253 members
7 members
549 members
20 members
Posted by don burkett on September 17, 2026 at 10:08
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by