Haynesville Tops Other Shales Today—Maybe Any Day
Article By Brian Brooks
Published Jul 7, 2009 Print E-mail


“Happy birthday to America—and to the Haynesville shale,” says Shannon Nome, Houston-based managing director and E&P analyst for Deutsche Bank Equity Research in a follow-up to her widely read and circulated year-ago "Shale to Shining Shale" report on U.S. gas shales.

”The Haynesville continues to dominate headlines as impressive drilling results and exciting joint-venture announcements have vaulted it past the Barnett as the No. 1 U.S. shale play in terms of rig activity.”

Haynesville shale results continue to impress, while activity in other shales is slowing down, Nome says.

“While a rush to hold acreage is one key driver for this increase, we believe strong drilling results have also fanned the flames of enthusiasm for Haynesville, which stands among the very few U.S. gas plays that can clear breakeven economic thresholds given the weak pricing backdrop.”

Acreage values in the Haynesville play have remained steady, despite the 70% drop in natural gas prices during the past year.

“Last July, we quoted a range of valuation from $15,000 to $40,000 per acre in our shale report, with a midpoint of $25,000, while stating a belief that per-acre prices would ultimately push up into the $50,000 range.”

Not all acreage transaction is slipping, though. “Today, while industry contacts suggest that the low end of acreage transaction values has slipped $5,000 per acre in the fringes of the play, land in the hottest part of the ‘core’ area in DeSoto Parish is indeed changing hands in the $50,000-per-acre realm,” she reports.

With big production and big reserves comes big interest, she adds.

“This divergence in low-end-versus-high-end acreage values, in our estimation, reflects differences in well performance that are starting to emerge as the play enters its second year of heavy activity.”

IP rates in the high range—above 20 MMcf/d—are becoming more and more frequent in the play’s best areas, although differences in testing phases hinder comparability. (IP rates measured over a 24-hour period produce different results than a two-week period.)

“That said, industry per-well EUR estimates seem to be walking generally higher as production history accumulates, and even in the ‘noncore’ areas, we note many wells are being commercially completed.”

And, takeaway capacity? “Pipeline projects further underscore optimism for future growth from the Haynesville, as roughly as 5 Bcf/d of proposals with targets dates on or before 2010 currently sit on the drawing board.”

With a gross production rate of around 1 Bcf/d, Nome expects playwide production to double or triple by 2010.

“Despite the major infrastructure projects in the works, we believe occasional bottlenecks in parts of the Haynesville shale-play area are likely to occur. As well, some producers may suffer attrition in their acreage unless they are able to successfully establish production before lease terms expire.”

Other risks include oil and gas exposure, weather delays, drilling/exploratory hazards, political/regulatory pressures and significant capital requirements, she adds.

Views: 20

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

just thinking out loud here.......why are companies willing to pay each other $50,000. per acre but wouldnt pay land/mineral owner that much? has anyone heard of a land/mineral owner being leased for $50,000. an acre?
Wolf:

Right in line with your thinking. It bears rereading the bottom half of the article to address not only 'why not' as to the higher $$$ values for bonuses at this point (besides the obvious motivation that O&G is primarily working to HBP as much of their initial leasehold investment as possible) but also that as time progresses, the proof in the pudding (as far as valuation is concerned) will begin to track IP, short-term and continuing flow rates in a given area rather than the broad 'HS fairway' or postulated core area(s).

Also King John, keep in mind that RI's consideration is paid both upfront (as bonus) and over time (the productive life of the lease) as royalty, without liability as to well cost(s). Market valuation of leasehold would factor in a recoupment of WI owner's investment to date, market value going forward as well as the necessity for continuing investment over the life of the lease.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service