Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by reallyoldguy on September 19, 2010 at 13:09

Shale: What about EnCana's Blackstone A-43 @ 31Mmcfd in San Augustine, EOG's Crane et al @ 31Mmcfd, and EOG's Murray gas unit @ 25 Mmcfd in Nacogdoches/Chireno?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ledlights on September 19, 2010 at 13:46

ROG - We still need some cumulative data. Those wells that you named are the Texas wells with the best IPs so far, but we don't have extended production stats for them yet. Time will tell. Isn't the question "best producers" not best IPs?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by reallyoldguy on September 19, 2010 at 14:34

Thanks led. I thought about that after I posted. Will be interesting to see how well these big Texas wells hold up...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on September 19, 2010 at 20:45

If the Encana Blackstone, A-43 averaged 27 million/day in it's 1st month of production, which would be 810 million cu. ft., I'd say it was off to a pretty good start!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on September 19, 2010 at 14:18

IP rates only give crowing rites for a short time. I would think that you would see IP rates that could maybe double the rates of the highest IP wells of the ones crowing at this point. The larger players have learned that this doesn't help the price of NG.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by reallyoldguy on September 19, 2010 at 14:37

Two Dogs: I dont understand how the IP's on the wells contribute to the price of nat gas???

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on September 19, 2010 at 14:44

If you have well after well coming in at over 40 million a day then it looks to speculators like we have a glut of gas. Not a market that makes for a safe investment at 4 bucks that could drop to 3 bucks or 2.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by reallyoldguy on September 19, 2010 at 14:47

I see, thanks. However, the HS wells are such a small percentage of all of the gas wells throughout the country. I wouldn't think that they, collectively, would have much bearing on the Nat'l average...?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on September 19, 2010 at 14:53

When you play the commodities market you are in the largest crap game in the world, the least thing will drive the market up or down.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Doob on September 19, 2010 at 16:06

In general you will see that IP, flowing pressure and peak month production are all correlative to reserves. And by these measures, Elm Grove, NE DeSoto, Red River and San Augustine TX are the best areas. San Augustine looks like it may be the best of the best, but it is early.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ledlights on September 19, 2010 at 10:54

I started a discussion a while back in which I posted some production summaries for the wells at the top of Les B.'s Hall of fame list.

http://www.gohaynesvilleshale.com/forum/topics/la-hall-of-fame-well

That data needs to be updated. FWIW - I only have access to data from Sonris. I am in the process of updating my spreadsheet which does an automated download of data from Sonris. It needs the addition of some wells and some remodeling too. The data that I download is per unit so it will eventually be not able to separate individual well data. Currently though most of the La. hall of fame wells are in units that are still reporting data for only 1 Haynesville (or Bossier?) well.

As of June reported data, the biggest ones on my list (where only a single well is being reported in the unit) were:

EGP 30 #H13 Well - Petrohawk Bossier Parish which had produced 4,206,606 MMCF in 18 months of reported production. Brown 17 #H4 also Petrohawk Bossier Parish might be in a similar ballpark but the data I have for it with 19 months of production includes a second well whose production numbers came on in the sixth month with the 2 well total being 7,656,975 MMCF through June. The Black Stone 6 #3 Well - Petrohawk DeSoto Parish has been coming on strong with 3,936,416 MMCF from only 8 months of reported production.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ledlights on September 19, 2010 at 11:16

Correction - those production totals are only through May.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page